FOREIGN TRADERS WERE BUSY IN PROVENCE IN 1212

Marseille and Arles are cities located in the southern part of France known as Provence. Arles is located on the Rhône river close to its mouth. Marseille is France’s largest port, and the second largest city in the country.

“In the eighth, ninth and tenth centuries Western Europe had little to offer foreign traders except slaves, yet its privileged classes craved the luxuries and exotic goods which could be bought in the East. Muslim or Jewish traders established in Marseilles and Garde Freinet offered good prices for slaves.” (Robin Blackburn, The making of New World slavery: from the Baroque to the modern, 1492-1800, Verso, 1997, p 43)

TRAFFICKING IN FOREIGN SLAVES

The traders discovered that the more successful they were, the more inventory they needed. And getting it was not always easy. And so they took to importing slaves: “also arriving at Verdun for onward transshiprnent to Spain or North Africa were Slavs taken prisoner in the East.” (Robin Blackburn, The making of New World slavery: from the Baroque to the modern, 1492-1800, Verso, 1997, p 43) Verdun is in France close to the borders with Belgium, Luxembourg, and Germany, and is marked by “A” on the map at right.

THE MARKET WANTED LIGHT-HAIRED SLAVES

Mr. Jacob Golan runs three “factories with slave labor” (per Yitzhak Tyler, the chief of undercover activities for the Haifa police cited in Michael Specter, Contraband Women, New York Times, January 11, 1998) “Israelis love Russian girls. They are blonde and good-looking and different from us.” (Jacob Golan cited in Michael Specter, Contraband Women, New York Times, January 11, 1998)

Arab buyers had a similar opinion. The Arab term Saqlab (or Sclav), meant a fair-headed slave. (Omeljan Pritsak, The Origin of Rus’, Volume One – Old Scandinavian Sources other than the Sagas, Harvard University Press, 1981, p 7)

AND THE MARSEILLE TRADERS RESPONDED

The Jewish Radaniya was based out of the Marseille area. Their business model involved trafficking in light-haired slaves from the Ukraine area, and selling them around the known world, but especially to the Islamics in North Africa. They traded silver coins struck in Islamic territories for the slaves. (Omeljan Pritsak, The Origin of Rus’, Volume One – Old Scandinavian Sources other than the Sagas, Harvard University Press, 1981, p 25)

AN INTERNATIONAL NETWORK

“During the ninth century, the Persian geographer lbn Khurradadhbih described the prodigious trading network of Jews from Radhan, a neighborhood of Baghdad, who journeyed across North Africa and the whole Eurasian landmass from France and Spain in the west to India and China in the east, crisscrossing the continents from north to south. These Radhanites had learned many of the languages spoken within this vast territory and traded in commodities as diverse as swords, brocade, eunuchs, and slaves from the west, to spices. perfumes, and precious woods from the east. The Radhanites were fortunate to be able to rely on the local knowledge of Jews living across both continents.

Middle Eastern Jews continued to participate extensively in international trade during the medieval period” (Myer Samra, Migration Patterns of Iraqi Jews in M. Avrum Ehrlich, Editor, Encyclopedia of the Jewish Diaspora – Origins, Experiences, and Culture, ABC-CLIO, 2008, p 354)

Hence the name Radaniya used by Pritsak. (Pritsak, supra) It comes from the Jewish quarter in Baghdad. (Samra, supra) And their network? From France and Spain way over to the east. (Samra, supra) And the commodity? “Slaves from the west”. (Samra, supra) And who helped them get the slaves? “Radhanites were fortunate to be able to rely on the local knowledge of Jews living across both continents”. (Samra, supra)

“This is a sophisticated, global operation. It’s evil, and it’s successful because the money is so good. These men pay $500 to $1,000 for a Ukrainian or Russian woman. Do you understand what I am telling you? They will buy these women and make a fortune out of them.” (Yitzhak Tyler, the chief of undercover activities for the Haifa police cited in Michael Specter, Contraband Women, New York Times, January 11, 1998)

LOWERING THE COST OF INVENTORY – AND “SOURCING” PRIME LIGHT-HAIRED CHILDREN FROM GERMANY

“During the course of the wars against the Albigensians, crusade preaching became a constant fact of life in northern France and parts of Germany.” (Thomas F. Madden, The new concise history of the Crusades, Rowman & Littlefield, 2005, p 136) The Marseille traders took notice. And so, “in early 1212, a young man named Nicholas from Cologne either initiated or quickly became the focus of a popular movement that swept through the Rhineland. Nicholas had in mind to go to Jerusalem and rescue the Holy City from the Muslims. Under divine instruction, he began walking south to the sea, which he believed would open up before him, allowing him to walk to Palestine. Tens, then hundreds, then thousands joined him in his march.” (Thomas F. Madden, The new concise history of the Crusades, Rowman & Littlefield, 2005, p 136) Thousands of? Light-haired children. “These Radhanites had learned many of the languages spoken within this vast territory and traded in commodities as diverse as swords, brocade, eunuchs, and slaves from the west“. (Samra, supra)

“Contemporary rabbinical responses provide further confirmation of the role played by Jews in the trade in children and young people as well as in the profitable transformation of boys into eunuchs. These texts reveal that anyone who engaged in such trade was aware of the risks involved, because any person caught and arrested in possession of castrated slaves in Christian territories was decapitated by order of the local authorities”. (Ariel Toaff, Pasque di sangue, translated by Gian Marco Lucchese and Pietro Gianetti located at http://www.bloodpassover.com/, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2007, p 129) Dr. Toaff is “Professor of Medieval and Renaissance History at Bar-Ilan University in Israel, Toaff has written Wine and Bread: A Jewish Community in the Middle Ages (1989; translated into English and French), Jewish Monsters: The Imaginary Jew from the Middle Ages to the Early Modern Age (1996) and Eating Jewish Style. Jewish Cooking in Italy from the Renaissance to the Modern Age (2000).” (Ariel Toaff, Pasque di sangue, translated by Gian Marco Lucchese and Pietro Gianetti located at http://www.bloodpassover.com/, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2007, Back Cover)

“This is a sophisticated, global operation. It’s evil, and it’s successful” (Yitzhak Tyler)

At the same time, in northern France (the light-haired part of the country), the same “instruction” was at work. But it was not “divine instruction”, as we shall see.

YOUNG JEW GETS A SPECIAL LETTER

“The leader of the French children was a 12-year-old boy named Stephen, who in May 1212 traveled with some companions from his village near Chartres to the court of King Philip Augustus at Saint-Denis. Stephen carried a letter he claimed had come from Christ himself, bidding Stephen to preach a new crusade.“

MARKETING AND PROMOTION – MADISON AVENUE 1212

“He began to travel around France, exhorting children to join him on a great expedition to the

THE JEWISH DREAM

east, promising them that the sea would part before them – just as it had for Moses and the Israelites when fleeing from Egypt to the Promised Land of Canaan – and they would be able to walk dry-shod to Palestine. The many youngsters who were eager to follow his lead gathered at Vendôme in late June, as Stephen had commanded, and from there they set out south for Marseilles.” “there were up to 30,000 children and their hangers-on marching down the byways of France. Led by Stephen in his horse-drawn cart, the children proceeded by way of Tours and Lyon“. (James Harpur, The Crusades: The Two Hundred Years War : the Clash Between the Cross and …?, The Rosen Publishing Group, 2008, p 82)

CHILDREN ON THE MOVE

In both Germany and France, well-financed boys made a splash. They had plenty of money to travel around the country. Stephen had his “horse-drawn cart“. (per Harpur, supra) But no job, because he was 12 years old. So, did Stephen and Nicholas have support staff along? Someone to pay the bills? Of course they did. There were those “hangers-on” (per Harpur, supra). They were along on the trip, and as the pilgrims progressed, some children were KIDNAPPED!

PICKED OFF ALONG THE WAY

“Children originally numbering 20,000 were led by Nicholas to various locations in Italy with the hope of continuing to the Holy Land. By the time they arrived their number had been greatly diminished by hunger, exposure (they had crossed the Alps), kidnapping, and murder. In Italy their hopes never materialized and, although it would appear that some reached the Holy Land, they were likely taken into slavery and prostitution.” (Evan Connel, Deus lo Volt! Chronicle of the Crusades, http://www.focusdesign.com/portfolio/crusades/pages/children.htm) “This is a sophisticated, global operation. It’s evil, and it’s successful because the money is so good. These men pay $500 to $1,000 for a Ukrainian or Russian woman. Do you understand what I am telling you? They will buy these women and make a fortune out of them.” (Yitzhak Tyler, the chief of undercover activities for the Haifa police cited in Michael Specter, Contraband Women, New York Times, January 11, 1998)

PREYED ON BY SLAVE TRADERS WHO ACCOMPANIED THE GROUPS

“They were accompanied by many adults”. (Jonathan Riley-Smith, The crusades: a history,
Continuum International Publishing Group, 2005, p 172) But these adult “hangers-on” were not doing a very good job of protecting the children. “That Christian Europe of the Middle Ages feared the Jews is an established fact. Perhaps the widespread fear that Jews were scheming to abduct children, subjecting them to cruel rituals, even antedates the appearance of stereotypical ritual murder which seems to have originated in the 12th century. As for myself, I believe that serious consideration should be given to the possibility that this fear was largely related to the slave trade, particularly in the 9th and 10th centuries, when the Jewish role in the slave trade appears to have been preponderant.

ABDUCTIONS WERE FREQUENT

During this period, Jewish merchants, from the cities in the valley of the Rhône, Verdun, Lione, Arles and Narbonne, in addition to Aquisgrana, the capital of the empire in the times of Louis the Pious [Louis I]; and in Germany from the centres of the valley of the Rhine, from Worms, Magonza and Magdeburg; in Bavaria and Bohemia, from Regensburg and Prague – were active in the principal markets in which slaves (women, men, eunuchs) were offered for sale, by Jews, sometimes after abducting them from their houses. From Christian
Europe the human merchandise was exported to the Islamic lands of Spain, in which there was a lively market. The castration of these slaves, particularly children, raised their prices, and was no doubt a lucrative and profitable practice.

JEWISH MERCHANTS SOURCING SLAVES FOR THE MUSLIM MARKET

The first testimony relating to the abduction of children by Jewish merchants active in the trade flowing into Arab Spain, comes down to us in a letter from Agobard, archbishop of Lyon in the years 816-840. The French prelate describes the appearance at Lyons of a Christian slave, having escaped from Cordoba,” who had been abducted by a “Leonese Jewish merchant twenty four years before, when he was a child, to be sold to the Moslems of Spain. His companion in flight was another Christian slave having suffered a similar fate after
being abducted six years before by Jewish merchants at Arles. The inhabitants of Lyons confirmed these claims, adding that yet another Christian boy had been abducted by Jews to be sold into slavery that same year. Agobard concludes his report with a comment of a general
nature; that these were not considered isolated cases, because, in every day practice, the Jews continued to procure Christian slaves for themselves and furthermore subjecting them to “infamies such that it would be vile in itself to describe them”“. (Ariel Toaff, Pasque di sangue, translated by Gian Marco Lucchese and Pietro Gianetti located at http://www.bloodpassover.com/, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2007, p 129)

MOVING TOWARDS THE DUNGEONS — VOLUNTARILY

“Women often start their hellish journey by choice”. Michael Specter, Contraband Women, New York Times, January 11, 1998)

And so the two columns of children progressed southwards. Not towards Jerusalem, but rather in the direction of Marseille. They were accompanied by “hangers-on”, but no guardians, and so their numbers were thinned considerably by kidnapping and murder along the way. (Connel, supra)

But sooner or later, what was left of the columns arrived in the Marseille area. If they had been traveling towards Palestine, the route would have gone through Germany, down the Danube, and through Turkey. But that wasn’t the plan.

While the Nicholas group from Germany was headed to Genova, some of the group “may have travelled west to Marseille where, the story goes, they were deceived by two merchants into embarking on ships from which many of them were sold into slavery in North Africa.”(Jonathan Riley-Smith, The crusades: a history, Continuum International Publishing Group, 2005, p 172)

And so the remaining children arrived in the area where “Jewish traders established in Marseilles and Garde Freinet offered good prices for slaves.” (Robin Blackburn, The making of New World slavery: from the Baroque to the modern, 1492-1800, Verso, 1997, p 43) The place where the Jewish Radaniya traded silver coins struck in Islamic territories for the slaves. (Omeljan Pritsak, The Origin of Rus’, Volume One – Old Scandinavian Sources other than the Sagas, Harvard University Press, 1981, p 25) But these slaves came on their own, and no silver coins to buy them were necessary. Oh, there had been travel expenses and remuneration for Stephen and Nicholas and their “hangers-on”, but that was just the cost of doing business.

“But then the unthinkable happened: the sea refused to part before them, and many became instantly disillusioned with Stephen and left. Those who stayed loyal to him, hoping that the miracle might yet happen, were then approached, it is said, by two local merchants whose actions and names, Hugh Ferreus and William Porcus.” “The two men offered to transport the children to the Holy Land free of charge, and the young crusaders, perhaps believing that God worked miracles in more than one way, gladly accepted the offer. Nothing more was heard of them for 18 years. Then in 1230, a survivor of the expedition, a young priest, returned to France from Egypt and related what had happened. The party had set out from Marseilles in seven ships, but two of them had been wrecked off the coast of Sardinia. The remaining five vessels had then been captured by Muslim pirates, who had apparently been tipped off by Hugh and William. The children were taken to Algeria, where some were sold in slavery, while others met the same fate after a journey to the markets of Alexandria. The priest himself had been enslaved but was later released.” (Harpur, supra, pp 82, 83)

These slave traders knew what they were doing all along. “Muslim or Jewish traders established in Marseilles and Garde Freinet offered good prices for slaves.” (Robin Blackburn, The making of New World slavery: from the Baroque to the modern, 1492-1800, Verso, 1997, p 43) William and Hugo are not Muslim names.

VILE DECEIVER

“Stephen of Cloyes may have been a boy in years, but he was most vile in his way of life, and his followers perished through the design of Satan”.(Norman Zacour, The Children’s Crusade, A History of the Crusades, Volume II, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1962, p 337) According to Thomas of Sherborne, this young Jew “promised the Sultan he would lead an army of Christians into bondage” and admitted that “he had led Frankish children into slavery when he was a child”. (Connel, supra)

He had backers. (Riley-Smith, supra) With Satanic motives. (Zacour, supra)

According to Aubrey de Trois-Fontaines, “The ribaldi and other evil men who joined them sullied the entire army, so that while some perished at sea, and others were sold, only a few of so great a multitude made their way home“. “Now, the betrayers of those children are said to have been Hugh Ferreus and William Porcus, merchants of Marseilles”. (Norman Zacour, The Children’s Crusade, A History of the Crusades, Volume II, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1962, pp 335-336)

SLAVE TRADERS GET COCKY

After the Children’s Crusade scam, these Jewish slave traders hatched a plan to capture the emperor Frederick, and sell him to Mirabel, the prince of the Saracens of Sicily. The emperor got word in time, and ended up hanging these evil men, as well as Mirabel and his two sons. (Norman Zacour, The Children’s Crusade, A History of the Crusades, Volume II, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1962, p 337)

POGROM IN RHEINLAND

After his huge role in this scam, Nicholas, who had played the front man in conning the German children, ” never returned, and the anger of the bereft Rhineland parents was visited on the boy’s father, who was killed by a lynch mob.” (Harpur, supra, p 83)

Even in Marseille, the Jews were no longer welcome.

For centuries, what they had done to the children was not forgotten: “After their expulsion from Provence, Jews tried on many occasions to settle in Marseilles, and a group of them did live there in the seventeenth century. However, they were accepted on sufferance and could hardly be considered legal residents. An Edict of May, 1682, ordering them to leave Marseilles was renewed on July 19, 1683, September 14, 1683, and November 15, 1690.” (Zosa Szajkowski, Jews and the French Revolutions of 1789, 1830 and 1848, KTAV Publishing House, 1970, p 281) “Judaism has been intertwined with slavery, both as an ideological and conceptual basis.” (Judaism and slavery, Wikipedia)

“Indeed, general medieval histories, if they mention Jews at all, refer to them almost exclusively as money-lenders or involved in slavery“. (Norman Roth, Medieval Jewish civilization: an encyclopedia, Routledge, 2003, p 189) The Jewish Radaniya consortium “controlled the slave trade from the Black Sea to North Africa from Arles.” (Norman Davies, Europe: a history, Oxford University Press, 1996, p 656)

But just in the Middle Ages? “The industry has proved very lucrative for the human traffickers, with each woman sold in Israel bringing in anywhere between $50,000 to $100,000“. (Mona Alami, Slave trade heads to Israel, Asia Times, 5 Oct 2008 )

Acknowledgements:

Maps from Google Maps

http://www.letour.fr/PHOTOS/TDF/2007/1100/D/de/_TDF_2007_DEP1100.jpg

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44540000/jpg/_44540089_arabcoins226index.jpg

http://pages.usherbrooke.ca/croisades/big_images/c_croisade_des_enfants1.jpg

Jefta was a “mighty man of valour”. (Judges 11:1, Holy
Bible) His operations were based out of Gilead — the region to the right of the Jordan river and south of the Jabbok River.

THAT NEED FOR SOMETHING ELSE

His father was named “Gilead”, and his mother was a prostitute. Oh, Gilead had some children with his Jewish wife (Judges 11:2, Holy Bible), but Jews are looking for something more than that. They need women who are ”blonde and good-looking and different from us. And they are desperate. They are ready to do anything for money.” (Jacob Golan cited in Michael Specter, Contraband Women, New York Times, January 11, 1998)

Roman Polanski is a mighty Jewish film director (the 2009 version of “mighty man of valour”). (Linda Deutsch, Ernst Abegg, Polanski’s arrest could be his path to freedom, AP, 27 Sep 2009) Like Gilead, he had access to Jewish women, but needed something more — something “‘blonde and good-looking and different from us.” (Golan, supra)

READY TO DO ANYTHING FOR MONEY

And he found a woman who was “ready to do anything for money”. Her name was Samantha Gailey, and she was 13 years of age. (Deutsch, supra) “He was arrested for having sex with the girl, whom he had hired as a model for a photo shoot at Jack Nicholson’s house”. (Deutsch, supra)

You might be thinking, Wait a minute. She was just willing to be a “model” in a private “photo shoot” with this Jew. She didn’t agree up front to anal sex with this Jewish legend.

WHEN THE MOTHER CONSENTS

“Women often start their hellish journey by choice. Seeking a better life, they are lured by local advertisements for good jobs in foreign countries at wages they could never imagine at home.” (Specter, supra)

In this case, because Samantha was underage, her mother made the choice. “Polanski received a new commission for Vogue Hommes to photograph young girls from around the world. One of the models was 13-year-old Samantha Gailey, from Woodland Hills, a Los Angeles suburb. Polanski went to see the girl’s mother, who gave her consent for the photo shoots, thrilled that the great Roman Polanski was going to photograph her daughter for Vogue. She even had no objection to the director’s request that she not accompany her daughter. There were two sessions, and on both occasions Polanski picked up the girl from her home.” (The Tragic Case of Roman Polanski, Spiegel, 7 Oct 2009)

FULL DISCLOSURE

Did the mother know it was a Jew she was renting her daughter’s services to? Mr. Polanski has made no secret of this fact: “Polanski, a native of France who was taken to Poland by his parents, escaped Krakow’s Jewish ghetto as a child during World War II and lived off the charity of strangers.” (Deutsch, supra)

WHAT “MIGHTY MEN OF VALOUR” DREAM OF

Mr. Polanski’s professional work was also not a secret: “Polanski was considered one of the most dazzling figures of the new Hollywood. His films seemed to emerge from some shadowy realm. In “Rosemary’s Baby,” he had Mia Farrow tied to a bed and raped by the devil. In “Chinatown,” a film about corruption in Los Angeles, Polanski played a gangster who slits open Nicholson’s nose. In the film, evil prevails in the end, and when Polanski was later asked what would have happened to the gangster he played, he said: “He would probably be in Mexico, screwing virgins.”" (The Tragic Case of Roman Polanski, Spiegel, 7 Oct 2009)

That’s mutilation like in the film Antichrist. “Jeers and laughter broke out during scenes ranging from a talking fox to graphically-portrayed sexual mutilation.” (Mike Collett-White, Lars von Trier film “Antichrist” shocks Cannes, Reuters, 17 May 2009)

And the mother knew about this, or should have. And she “gave her consent for the photo shoots, thrilled that the great Roman Polanski was going to photograph her daughter for Vogue.” (The Tragic Case of Roman Polanski, Spiegel, 7 Oct 2009)

DRUGS, AS USUAL

The Chinatown poster gives it all away — another tobacco promotion film. The film watchers are encouraged to try the drug. It deadens their senses. And then, the Jewish director moves in to take care of his real business:

“On March 20, 1977, the day of the second session, Polanski and the girl drove to the house of Jack Nicholson at 12850 Mulholland Drive. They were alone. When they arrived, the girl said that she was thirsty, according to the 39-page statement Gailey later made to the district attorney.

Polanski gave her champagne, and she drank it.” (The Tragic Case of Roman Polanski, Spiegel, 7 Oct 2009)

But maybe the alcohol wasn’t enough?

“Polanski went to the bathroom to get a Quaalude, a drug that was popular at the time and that produces a euphoric feeling and acts as an aphrodisiac. Polanski gave her half a pill, but at first she refused to take it.” (The Tragic Case of Roman Polanski, Spiegel, 7 Oct 2009)

At first.

And after this girl had the drugs in the system, Polanski’s real work was easy:

“Polanski kissed her vagina. The girl said no, told him to stop, but he continued his advances and eventually penetrated her. He asked her whether she was taking the pill and when she had last had her period. “I said, ‘I don’t know. A week or two. I’m not sure,’” Gailey said.

Eventually Polanski had anal sex with her, the girl testified.

STRONG DRUGS = WEAK RESISTANCE

“Did you resist at that time?” the district attorney asked.

“A little bit, but not really”" (The Tragic Case of Roman Polanski, Spiegel, 7 Oct 2009)

“Women often start their hellish journey by choice. Seeking a better life, they are lured by local advertisements for good jobs in foreign countries at wages they could never imagine at home.” (Specter, supra)

The pay for photo shoots for Jewish magazines like Vogue is higher than pay for babysitting jobs. And little Samantha chose to be a model for “the great Roman Polanski”. The mother knew than Polanski needed to get her daughter “alone”. And the rest is history. (The Tragic Case of Roman Polanski, Spiegel, 7 Oct 2009)

VERY GREAT SLAUGHTER

Jefta led a Jewish army into action against the poeple of Ammon. “he smote them from Aroer, even till thou come to Minnith, even twenty cities, and unto the plain of the vineyards, with a very great slaughter.” (Judges 11, Holy Bible) After the great slaughter, Jefta “came to Mizpeh unto his house, and, behold, his daughter came out to meet him with timbrels and with dances: and she was his only child; beside her he had neither son nor daughter.” (Judges 11, Holy Bible) And to celebrate his success in battle, Jefta burnt his own daughter alive. (Judges 11:39, Holy Bible) Note in the picture at right that he had her hands tied as he placed her on the pile of wood.

Hands tied? There isn’t much resistance when drugs are involved – alcohol, quaaludes. The sorts of weapons Mr. Polanski knew how to use. (per The Tragic Case of Roman Polanski, Spiegel, 7 Oct 2009)

AND THEN IT WAS TIME TO TAKE A JOURNEY TO EXORCISE HIS DEMONS

Jewish director Lars von Triers work is characterized by “galskapen, en reise som kanskje også innebærer en eksorsisme av regissørens egne demoner” (Anne Hof, – Ikke la deg skremme!, NRK, 6 Jun 2009) Insanity, a journey that perhaps can involve exorcism of the director’s own demons.

After burning his own daughter, Jefta needed to take a journey to exorcise his own demons.

ZERO TOLERANCE FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH / EPHRAIM JEWS SLAUGHTERED

It seems the Jews in Ephraim had insulted the Jews in Gilead:

“Then Jephthah gathered together all the men of Gilead, and fought with Ephraim: and the men of Gilead smote Ephraim, because they said, Ye Gileadites are fugitives of Ephraim among the Ephraimites, and among the Manassites.” (Judges 12:4, Holy Bible)

And the Jews in Gilead said, “No problem. We love you fellow Jews anyway”?

Not quite.

SEVERE PUNISHMENT FOR MASSIVE DISHONESTY

“And the Gileadites took the passages of Jordan before the Ephraimites: and it was so, that when those Ephraimites which were escaped said, Let me go over; that the men of Gilead said unto him, Art thou an Ephraimite? If he said, Nay;

Then said they unto him, Say now Shibboleth: and he said Sibboleth: for he could not frame to pronounce it right. Then they took him, and slew him at the passages of Jordan: and there fell at that time of the Ephraimites forty and two thousand” (Judges 12:5,6, Holy Bible)

Apparently they let the honest Jews go. But 42 000 of the Jews from Ephraim were liars, who were punished on the spot for their lies.

“The discussion so far should have made it clear that, whatever the Law of Return or halakhic law says, to be Jewish is primarily a matter of feeling, of emotional commitment.” (Raphael Patai, The Jewish Mind, 1996, Wayne State University Press, p 23) Emotional commitment to those core values. The values acted out in the life and works of Jefta, Lars von Trier, and Roman Polanski.

“Polanski was considered one of the most dazzling figures of the new Hollywood. His films seemed to emerge from some shadowy realm. In “Rosemary’s Baby,” he had Mia Farrow tied to a bed and raped by the devil.” (The Tragic Case of Roman Polanski, Spiegel, 7 Oct 2009)

This “shadowy realm” is not heaven. It has nothing to do with what is good. Instead, these people dream and scheme for a world where “evil prevails in the end”. (as per The Tragic Case of Roman Polanski, Spiegel, 7 Oct 2009)

And the resistance to the moves?

“A little bit, but not really” (The Tragic Case of Roman Polanski, Spiegel, 7 Oct 2009)

Because the warnings are out there. From history and contemporary films. “The warning flags were just pushed aside”. (Marcy Gordon, Madoff scandal, SEC role under scrutiny, AP, 6 Jan 2009)

Jefta’s daughter knew her father was a Jew. She knew Jefta was involved in a great slaughter. So she put some distance between herself and her father? Oh, no, she ran to meet him with “with timbrels and with dances“. (Judges 11:34, Holy Bible)

Samantha Gailey’s mother was elated that the great Jewish artist would have a “private session” with her daughter as a “model”.

And that’s why “mighty men of valour” like Jefta and Roman Polanski, not to mention the tobacco, cosmetics, and film industries, succeed again and again.

And there was a “very great slaughter.” (Judges 11:33, Holy Bible)

The sister at left is in distress. As so many people are in Africa these days.

RAPE AND THEFT

Just face it — they live in a dangerous neighborhood. In a place where “soldiers systematically raped women and looted houses in the town of Mambasa and in villages along the road towards Beni”. (UN condemns DR Congo cannibalism, BBC, 15 Jan 2003)

But those raped were the lucky ones — they were still alive when all was said and done.

PLENTY OF CANNABALISM

Considerably less lucky: “In one case, investigators heard how a young girl was cut into small pieces by the soldiers and then eaten.” (id.)

Just one case?

“Other examples include hearts and other organs being cut out of victims and forced on their families to eat.” (id.)

THE CAUSE

How can these things be happening?

Let’s check in with Toto:

MUST BE THOSE “WILD DOGS”

“The wild dogs cry out in the night
As they grow restless longing for some solitary company
I know that I must do what’s right
Sure as Kilimanjaro rises like Olympus above the Serengeti I seek to cure what’s deep inside, frightened of this thing that I’ve become” (Toto, Africa Lyrics)

Ah, the problem is “deep inside”. Its “this thing” that the people have become.

MANY NEGROES LOVE AFRICA

There are plenty of African Negroes who like Africa:

“Its gonna take a lot to drag me away from you
There’s nothing that a hundred men or more could ever do
I bless the rains down in Africa” (Toto, Africa Lyrics)

FROM WHITE FLIGHT

“the residential movement of white people from the city to the suburbs or from one suburb to another in an effort to evade members of some ethnic group, esp. black people” (white flight definition, Webster’s New World College Dictionary)

TO BLACK FLIGHT

There are some Negroes in Africa who are fed up with the crime and cannibalism. And so they move from Congo to Zambia? Some do.

But so many have decided the problem lies “deep inside” the people (per Toto, supra) And so they decide to move to Europe — “to evade members of some ethnic group, esp. black people” (white flight definition, Webster’s New World College Dictionary)

FROM THE CAMPS OF AFRICA TO THE RURAL COMMUNITIES OF NORWAY

And this is easy? Thanks to their Jewish brethren running Norway it is. Every year, the government of Norway rolls out the red carpet for 1200 African refugees. “Mange av de 1200 kvoteflyktningene som Norge mottar årlig kommer rett fra flyktningeleire i Afrika”. (Ane Høyem, Ingrid Danielsen, Kvoteflyktningers helsesjekkes ikke før de sendes ut til kommunene, NRK, 12 Oct 2009)

Oslo is already full of foreign ethnic groups, so the new refugees are parceled out to communities around the country.

DESTINATION OSLO WOULDN’T SOLVE THE PROBLEM FOR THESE REFUGEES

After all, if these African refugees are flying to another continent to get away from black people in Africa, they wouldn’t be very happy getting stuck in a black neighborhood like Grünerløkka/Oslo.

Well, the UN High Commission for Refugees likes to help the Negroes from Africa, so they asked the North Norway communities of Sortland, Bø, and Hadsel if they could take 47 refugees from Somalia. (Høyem, supra) This remote community in the north would be just the place for these stressed-out refugees to get away from all those black people. And so, on 25 and 26 Mar 2009, these talented gifts to the community arrived at Stokmarknes, all ready to enrich the islands, and contribute to a vibrant multicultural society.

THE COMING OF TUBERCULOSIS

“De fleste av disse menneskene var syke av tuberkulose.” (Høyem, supra) “The warning flags were just pushed aside”. (Marcy Gordon, Madoff scandal, SEC role under scrutiny, AP, 6 Jan 2009) Most of these people were sick with tuberculosis. (Høyem, supra) And the causes? Oh, things like AIDS and “immune deficiencies”. (Causes of Tuberculosis, WrongDiagnosis.com) This is a disease which is contagious, and fatal 40 to 60% of the time if not treated.

So these refugees are placed in quarantine when they come to Norway? Of course not. They are placed directly into communities. (Høyem, supra)

Sture Pedersen runs Bø. He’s not pleased with the government in Oslo dumping such big problems on his region: “Informasjonen har vært for dårlig, og det går ut over flyktningene. Vi ante ikke hvem disse menneskene var”. (Høyem, supra) “The information has been bad. And the problem is bigger than the refugees. We didn’t know who these people were.”

And Mr. Pedersen’s solution? Oh, he’s called a meeting to restore trust!!! “Kommunikasjonen må bli bedre. Vi har derfor innkalt til et møte for å rette opp i tillitsforholdet. Ting må inn på rett spor igjen, sier Pedersen.” (Høyem, supra) “Communication needs to be better. So we’ve called a meeting to restore trust. Things need to run properly”.

But Ane Høyem and Ingrid Danielsen of NRK know better. Their article is accompanied by the graphic at left: The Unstoppable is Here.

Oh, Sture Pedersen thinks things are fine: “Han vil benytte anledningen til å skryte av helsepersonellet i kommunen som har tatt seg av kvoteflyktningene. – Mye på grunn av dem så har man greid å ta imot flykningene på en utmerket måte, og de fungerer nå godt i samfunnet vårt, avslutter Sture Pedersen.” (Høyem, supra) Sture Pedersen has praised the health personnel in the community for caring for the refugees. “Thanks to them, we have managed to receive the refugees in an excellent manner, and they function well in our society“.

ANALYSIS

Is this a story we’ve heard before? Of course. Sture Pedersen claims the information was bad, and that he had “no idea” who these people were. (Høyem, supra)

Pat Tillman was a man who made really bad decisions. And he had “no idea” who these people were?

He should have known. “Tillman talked about everything, with everyone. According to the speakers, he had read the Bible, the Koran, the Book of Mormon, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, and he underlined passages constantly.” (Gwen Knapp, True hero athlete, San Francisco Chronicle, 4 May 2004, p D-1) After all, Pat Tillman had read the Bible. In our very thorough study of his case, we reviewed the warnings he had. But “The warning flags were just pushed aside”. (Marcy Gordon, Madoff scandal, SEC role under scrutiny, AP, 6 Jan 2009)

So, could Sture Pedersen have gotten the information he needed? In 30 minutes of internet time?

OF COURSE.

He could have surfed right on over to Somali Immigration to Norway: Earthquakes – From L’Aquila to Norway.

Through the night from Saturday to Sunday, 5 April 2009, the police in Oslo were conducting intensive patrols, looking for thieves. At left, we see the Oslo police restraining one of the thieves. The thief’s face is black.

He and his friends were out Saturday night with knives and at least one pistol. This African gang was cruising the streets, and robbing pedestrians. The youngest victim was 15.

The Negro gang beat and kicked at least one victim so bad that he had to be hospitalized with head injuries. When these young Negroes showed up, they wanted to steal money and hurt the Norwegians.

The Negroes wanted cash cards (with PIN codes) and mobile telephones.

The action went down in the Grünerløkka area. (Grethe Kielland Jenssen, Kjetil Grude Flekkøy, Væpnet gjeng ranet folk på gata, NRK, 5 Apr 2009) An area that used to be Norwegian, but is now anything but that. The old structures there, like a peaceful Nordic population, schools with Nordic children, and the religious and cultural life have been all been destroyed by the foreign invasion.

PLENTY OF GOOD INFORMATION

Sture Pedersen was wrong: “Informasjonen har vært for dårlig, og det går ut over flyktningene. Vi ante ikke hvem disse menneskene var”. (Høyem, supra) “The information has been bad. And the problem is bigger than the refugees. We didn’t know who these people were.”

He could have visited Grünerløkka to find out. Or this website. There’s plenty of excellent information out there.

AND WHEN PEOPLE IGNORE IT, THEY PAY THE PRICE

Information we examined in the Tillman study: Rich knows what happened to Pat: “”Pat isn’t with God,” he said. “He’s f — ing dead. He wasn’t religious. So thank you for your thoughts, but he’s f — ing dead.” (Rich Tillman cited in Knapp, supra) So Rich has decided to believe?

““I’ll tell you something more strange,” Richard says, lifting his face as he blows cigarette smoke out of the corner of his mouth. “After listening to this (expletive) at Dad’s, I said to Bailey on the way here, ‘I don’t care what anyone says. I think my brother was (expletive) murdered.’” (Rich Tillman cited in Katie Halper, Pat Tillman Remembered By Mother In New Book, Take Part, 4 May 2008)

The brother was murdered. Everyone agrees. So Rich Tillman believes the warnings now?

Oh, no, he’s smoking Jewish cigarettes. These packages have plenty of warning labels. But he doesn’t believe.

And that’s how it is with Sture Pedersen. The warnings are out there, they are abundant, and they are so often ignored! Which is exactly what these people are doing now in Vesterålen. “The warning flags were just pushed aside”. (Marcy Gordon, Madoff scandal, SEC role under scrutiny, AP, 6 Jan 2009)

NO ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION

But didn’t Mr. Pedersen claim that owing to the heroic efforts of the health personnel, the refugees have been nicely received and are functioning well in society?

The Jewish banker “Sarrazin said that 20 per cent of the population of Berlin were economically unnecessary.

“A large number of Arabs and Turks in this city, whose numbers have grown thanks to the wrong policies, have no productive function except selling fruit and vegetables.”” Thilo Sarazin is a “senior official of the German federal bank”. (Will Thilo Sarrazin quit German Bundesbank over interview?, Bild.com, 6 Oct 2009)

Pat and Rich Tillman were warned, but they ignored the warnings. Sture Pedersen should know about the warnings, but he pretends everything is fine.

BUT THEY DO HAVE A FUNCTION ON THE STREETS “AFTER HOURS”

In Oslo, they can’t ignore the warnings anymore. (per Grethe Kielland Jenssen, Kjetil Grude Flekkøy, Væpnet gjeng ranet folk på gata, NRK, 5 Apr 2009)

So was the problem AIDS and tuberculosis? Or was it something more?

THE PROBLEM IS BIGGER THAN TUBERCULOSIS — MUCH BIGGER

Sture Pedersen thinks it was something more: “det går ut over flyktningene. Vi ante ikke hvem disse menneskene var”. (Høyem, supra) “the problem is bigger than the refugees. We didn’t know who these people were.”

And Mr. Pedersen is right. It is something more. Something deep inside: “I seek to cure what’s deep inside, frightened of this thing that I’ve become“. (Toto, Africa Lyrics) Something that caused the problems in Africa that these quota refugees would like to leave behind them.

And when this frightening trait, deep inside these people comes out?

Remember Haiti in 1791. Back in the days when “the fifty thousand, who, after weeks of preparation in the deepest secret, had unleashed the Night of Fire that held the whites paralyzed in dazed horror.
In a matter of days, two thousand whites were killed, 180 sugar plantations and 900 coffee plantations were destroyed, and two million francs’ worth of damage inflicted.” (Martin Ros, Translated by Karin Ford-Treep, Night of Fire – The Black Napoleon and the Battle for Haiti, SARPEDON, 1991, p 6)

RELATED READING:

La Fille d’Artagnan Questions; Fjellhaug Devil Sighting Answers

Earthquakes – From L’Aquila to Norway

You might be thinking, This is a story about the well-known football player who gave up his career, and his life, to serve his country. And in a way it is.

But really, when you get into the inside of the story, you’ll see that this is much bigger. Its the story of millions of young men.

FOOTBALL AND THE AMERICAN PATH UPWARDS

Mr. Tillman took the typical path into American sports, playing linebacker at Arizona State University. This man excelled in his studies as well, completing his college degree in less than four years with a GPA of 3.84 (out of 4.0). In 1998, he moved into the world of professional football with the Cardinals, an American football team in Arizona. Here, he did a good job as well.

WHEN NEWS COVERAGE OF AN EVENT CHANGES THE THINKING OF AMERICANS

And then 2001 came. This was the year when the towers fell.

LIES FROM AMERICAN GOVERNMENT

We learned here about the American government “intelligence”/torture activity which spends $47.5 billion per year. An activity which “developed” intelligence that the T-bosses were running their weapons of mass destruction out of caves in Afghanistan. This intelligence has proven to be false, as the T-bosses are still a threat after eight years of fruitless searching in the caves.

“treach·er·y (tr ch -r ). n. pl. treach·er·ies. 1. Willful betrayal of fidelity, confidence, or trust; perfidy. 2. The act or an instance of such betrayal.” (treachery – definition of treachery by the Free Online Dictionary)HE KNEW BETTER

As we have learned here, when the American military speaks, it lies. This pattern of bloodthirsty, dishonest activity was nothing new.

And Pat Tillman knew it. “Tillman talked about everything, with everyone. According to the speakers, he had read the Bible, the Koran, the Book of Mormon, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, and he underlined passages constantly.” (Gwen Knapp, True hero athlete, San Francisco Chronicle, 4 May 2004, p D-1)

ARIEL SHARON ON WHO RUNS AMERICA

“An acrimonious argument erupted during the Israeli cabinet weekly session last week between Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his foreign Minister Shimon Peres during which Sharon reportedly yelled at Peres, saying, ‘Don’t worry about American pressure, we control America.’
According the Israeli Hebrew radio Kol Yisrael Wednesday, Peres warned Sharon that refusing to heed incessant American requests for a cease-fire with the Palestinians would endanger Israeli interests and turn the US against us. At this point, a furious Sharon reportedly turned toward Peres, saying ‘every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do
that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.’” (Check this out – ‘We Control America’ says Sharon (with sources), Indymedia Ireland, 12 Apr 2002)

“From 465 to the end of the eleventh century, more than forty Church Councils enacted legislation concerning the Jews, that is, once every sixteen years on the average. The fact that the Church felt constrained to reiterate these prohibitions and warnings with such frequency can lead to only one conclusion”. (Raphael Patai, Jennifer Patai, The myth of the Jewish race, Wayne State University Press, 1989, p 73)

BUT IS THERE ANY REAL-LIFE PROOF OF THIS?

But wasn’t the late Ariel Sharon just one man. Can this really be?

As we learned here and here, Jewish tobacco products cause lung cancer, and have no positive benefits.

“In Hungary, the adoption of Christianity by the pagan Magyars in the tenth century was soon followed by the emergence of concern about keeping the Jews down and separate from the Christian majority. It was felt that the Judaizing influences, discussed in our chapter on proselytism, had to be kept in check, and for this purpose the Council of Szabolcs in 1092 prohibited Jews from marrying Christians, owning Christian slaves, and so on.” (Raphael Patai, Jennifer Patai, The myth of the Jewish race, Wayne State University Press, 1989, p 113)

Tobacco addiction is slavery to nicotine (and the people who sell it). So the American government outlaws these dangerous products? Oh, no, they market them intensively to their soldiers!

“treach·er·y (tr ch -r ). n. pl. treach·er·ies. 1. Willful betrayal of fidelity, confidence, or trust; perfidy. 2. The act or an instance of such betrayal.” (treachery – definition of treachery by the Free Online Dictionary)

The Jewish-controlled US military seems to be at war all the time. Just like things were in the old days:

1 In the spring, at the time when kings go off to war, David sent Joab out with the king’s men and the whole Israelite army. They destroyed the Ammonites and besieged Rabbah. But David remained in Jerusalem. (2 Samuel 11 (New International Version))

ORGY OF DESTRUCTION

Destroyed the Ammonites? How about “destroyed Iraq”? Or Iceland? The top Jews stay in London, New York, or, as King David did, in Jerusalem. Meanwhile, those brave soldiers are off on the front line.

AND WHILE THE SOLDIERS WERE OFF ON THE FRONT LINES

2 One evening David got up from his bed and walked around on the roof of the palace. From the roof he saw a woman bathing. The woman was very beautiful, 3 and David sent someone to find out about her. The man said, “Isn’t this Bathsheba, the daughter of Eliam and the wife of Uriah the Hittite?” 4 Then David sent messengers to get her. She came to him, and he slept with her. (She had purified herself from her uncleanness.) Then [a] she went back home. 5 The woman conceived and sent word to David, saying, “I am pregnant.” (2 Samuel 11 (New International Version))

“treach·er·y (tr ch -r ). n. pl. treach·er·ies. 1. Willful betrayal of fidelity, confidence, or trust; perfidy. 2. The act or an instance of such betrayal.” (treachery – definition of treachery by the Free Online Dictionary)

What to do? A story like this could poison the atmosphere at the front if word got around. Why not bring Uriah back to sleep with his wife, and be the “father” of that baby that was now on the way?

6 So David sent this word to Joab: “Send me Uriah the Hittite.” And Joab sent him to David. 7 When Uriah came to him, David asked him how Joab was, how the soldiers were and how the war was going. 8 Then David said to Uriah, “Go down to your house and wash your feet.” So Uriah left the palace, and a gift from the king was sent after him. (2 Samuel 11 (New International Version))

BUT THIS MAN WAS MUCH TOO PATRIOTIC

9 But Uriah slept at the entrance to the palace with all his master’s servants and did not go down to his house.

10 When David was told, “Uriah did not go home,” he asked him, “Haven’t you just come from a distance? Why didn’t you go home?”

11 Uriah said to David, “The ark and Israel and Judah are staying in tents, and my master Joab and my lord’s men are camped in the open fields. How could I go to my house to eat and drink and lie with my wife? As surely as you live, I will not do such a thing!“

12 Then David said to him, “Stay here one more day, and tomorrow I will send you back.” So Uriah remained in Jerusalem that day and the next. 13 At David’s invitation, he ate and drank with him, and David made him drunk. But in the evening Uriah went out to sleep on his mat among his master’s servants; he did not go home. (2 Samuel 11 (New International Version))

PURE AND SIMPLE HEROES – MAKING SACRIFICES FOR THE ARMY

So much like Pat Tillman, who was: “a pure and simple hero, a millionaire athlete who gave up wealth and fame to become the ideal patriot“. (Knapp, supra) Yes, Uriah gave up the comforts of home and the marital bed. He was into solidarity with his fellow soldiers.

Just like Pat Tillman: “It has been said over and over that he wouldn’t want to be revered while we ignore the other soldiers lost in Iraq and Afghanistan.” (Knapp, supra)

So, the Jewish king came clean about what he had done, and said, Look, Uriah, raise the little fellow for me? Not at all:

FIERCE BATTLE

14 In the morning David wrote a letter to Joab and sent it with Uriah. 15 In it he wrote, “Put Uriah in the front line where the fighting is fiercest. Then withdraw from him so he will be struck down and die.” (2 Samuel 11 (New International Version))

“treach·er·y (tr ch -r ). n. pl. treach·er·ies. 1. Willful betrayal of fidelity, confidence, or trust; perfidy. 2. The act or an instance of such betrayal.” (treachery – definition of treachery by the Free Online Dictionary)

Uriah got right up front. Just like Pat Tillman liked to: “”Pat didn’t want to be the focal point, but he liked being out front,” McGinnis said”. (Knapp, supra)

OR MADE-UP STORY

And that’s how it went with Pat Tillman. According to the American government, he was out on the front lines in a bitter firefight with the Taliban. It was a special sort of firefight: “No evidence at all of enemy fire was found at the scene – no one was hit by enemy fire, nor was any government equipment struck.” (Was Tillman Murdered? AP Gets New Documents, AP, 26 Jul 2007)

Pat Tillman and Uriah made “the ultimate sacrifice” (per Knapp, supra) for their Jewish kings/presidents.

EXECUTION STYLE KILLING

“U.S. Army medical examiners were suspicious about the close proximity of the three bullet holes in Pat Tillman’s forehead and tried without success to get authorities to investigate whether the former professional football player’s death amounted to a crime, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press.

“The medical evidence did not match up with the scenario as described,” a doctor who examined Tillman’s body after he was killed on the battlefield in Afghanistan in 2004 told investigators.

The doctors — whose names were blacked out — said the bullet holes were so close together that it appeared the Army Ranger was cut down by an M-16 fired from a mere 10 yards or so away.” (Doctors Suspicious Of Tillman Bullet Holes, AP, July 27, 2007)

“treach·er·y (tr ch -r ). n. pl. treach·er·ies. 1. Willful betrayal of fidelity, confidence, or trust; perfidy. 2. The act or an instance of such betrayal.” (treachery – definition of treachery by the Free Online Dictionary)

Uriah was killed, and Pat Tillman was killed. The order to kill Uriah is public knowledge several thousand years after the fact. The order to kill Pat Tillman hasn’t been made public just yet.

WHOSE FAULT WAS IT?

“Ancient people of Asia Minor and Syria who flourished from 1600 to 1200 B.C. The Hittites, a people of Indo-European connection, were supposed to have entered Cappadocia around 1800 B.C. The Hittite empire, with its capital at Bogazköy (also called as Hattusas), was the chief power and cultural force in Western Asia from 1400 to 1200 B.C. It was a loose confederation that broke up under the invasions (c.1200 B.C.) of the Thracians, Phrygians, and Assyrians. The Neo-Hittite kingdom (c.1050-c.700 B.C.) that followed was conquered by the Assyrians. The Hittites were one of the first peoples to smelt iron successfully. They spoke an Indo-European language.” (Burak Sansal, The Hittites, All About Turkey) In other words, Uriah was a white man who was serving in the Jewish military. Just like Pat Tillman.

The conquest of Palestine by Jews coming up from Egypt was still common knowledge in the days of Uriah the Hittite. And Pat Tillman? He had read the Bible. And lots of other books. (per Knapp, supra)

These men knew who they were dealing with. But ignored the warnings.

And paid the price.

And what did Jesus think of these people? “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” (Jesus cited in John 8:44, Holy Bible)

Well, Pat had read all this. And he believed?

NOT AT ALL

“”Pat isn’t with God,” he said. “He’s f — ing dead. He wasn’t religious. So thank you for your thoughts, but he’s f — ing dead.” (Rich Tillman cited in Knapp, supra)

“He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.” (Jesus cited in Mark 16:16, Holy Bible)

And that’s how it is. Pat Tillman and Uriah the Hittite had the warnings of history. They didn’t believe. And paid for it.

AND THE JEWISH MILITARY LIED ABOUT IT?

“The last soldier to see Army Ranger Pat Tillman alive, Spc. Bryan O’Neal, told lawmakers that he was warned by superiors not to divulge — especially to the Tillman family — that a fellow soldier killed Tillman.

O’Neal particularly wanted to tell fellow soldier Kevin Tillman, who was in the convoy traveling behind his brother at the time of the 2004 incident in Afghanistan.

“I wanted right off the bat to let the family know what had happened, especially Kevin, because I worked with him in a platoon and I knew that he and the family all needed to know what had happened,” O’Neal testified. “I was quite appalled that when I was actually able to speak with Kevin, I was ordered not to tell him.”

Asked who gave him the order, O’Neal replied that it came from his battalion commander, then-Lt. Col. Jeff Bailey.

“He basically just said … ‘Do not let Kevin know, that he’s probably in a bad place knowing his brother’s dead,’ ” O’Neal told House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry Waxman. “And he made it known I would get in trouble, sir, if I spoke with Kevin on it being fratricide.”

The military instead released a “manufactured narrative” detailing how Pat Tillman died leading a courageous counterattack in an Afghan mountain pass, Kevin Tillman told the committee.” (Soldier: Army ordered me not to tell truth about Tillman,CNN, 25 Apr 2007)

“treach·er·y (tr ch -r ). n. pl. treach·er·ies. 1. Willful betrayal of fidelity, confidence, or trust; perfidy. 2. The act or an instance of such betrayal.” (treachery – definition of treachery by the Free Online Dictionary)

If the little matter of the Jewish King David having sex with the wife of a front soldier came out, the Jewish king would have been in trouble. And so it was with the Jewish (US) military. If it came out they had murdered their own soldiers, they’d be in a spot.

And so they lied about it.

AN “OPPORTUNE” TIME TO LIE

“As the tide was turning in the U.S. battle against Afghan insurgents — and as media outlets prepared to release reports on detainee abuse at Abu Ghraib in Iraq — the military saw Pat Tillman’s death as an “opportunity,” Kevin Tillman told the panel.

US GOVERNMENT: “UTTER FICTION”

Even after it became clear the report was bogus, the military clung to the “utter fiction” that Pat Tillman was killed by a member of his platoon who was following the rules of engagement, the brother said.

“Revealing that Pat’s death was a fratricide would have been yet another political disaster during a month already swollen with disasters,” Kevin Tillman said. “The facts needed to be suppressed. An alternative narrative had to be constructed, crucial evidence destroyed.”

Tillman bristled at the military claim that the initial report was merely misleading.

HORRIBLE MUTILIATION

Clearly resentful, he told the panel that writing a field report stating that his brother had been “transferred to an intensive care unit for continued CPR after most of his head had been taken off by multiple 5.56 rounds is not misleading.”

“These are deliberate and calculated lies,” he said.

Pat Tillman, who became a national hero after he gave up a lucrative contract with the NFL’s Arizona Cardinals to join the Army’s elite Rangers force, was awarded the Silver Star, the military’s third-highest combat decoration, after the Army said he was killed leading a counterattack.

O’Neal testified that his superiors had him write a statement about the incident for Tillman’s Silver Star commendation. He said the final version contained false statements about enemy fire that had been inserted by someone else.

SURE

Thomas F. Gimble, the Defense Department’s acting inspector general, said that investigators could not determine who altered O’Neal’s statement and that no attempt was made to examine the document’s electronic history.

The Army later acknowledged not only that Tillman was killed by his fellow soldiers, but that officers in Tillman’s chain of command knew the counterattack story was bogus.” (Soldier: Army ordered me not to tell truth about Tillman,CNN, 25 Apr 2007)

“treach·er·y (tr ch -r ). n. pl. treach·er·ies. 1. Willful betrayal of fidelity, confidence, or trust; perfidy. 2. The act or an instance of such betrayal.” (treachery – definition of treachery by the Free Online Dictionary)

“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” (Jesus cited in John 8:44, Holy Bible)

So what else should these warriors have expected?

The reader may have found it difficult to believe that the U.S. military was deliberately destroying their own soldiers, as we learned here.

Mary Tillman, Pat’s mother, has checked into these matters, and she says:

MOTHER CONFIRMS IT: NO TRUTH IN US MILITARY STORIES

“”Pat was all about integrity”. “There is absolutely no integrity in any of this.”

LUST TO KILL — MURDERERS FROM THE BEGINNING

“These soldiers (with Pat) were not in a fog of war but in a lust to fight.“

BUT FOR THESE PEOPLE, ITS BUSINESS AS USUAL

“Instead, they all went on, business as usual. If we’re really killing our own soldiers so much that it’s not a big deal, maybe it’s time to wrap the whole thing up.” (Mary Tillman cited in Marco della Cava, After mother Mary Tillman’s loss came ‘no integrity’, USA TODAY, 5 May 2008)

Well, Pat Tillman knew the warnings, and didn’t believe.

So what about his brothers. Rich knows what happened to Pat: “”Pat isn’t with God,” he said. “He’s f — ing dead. He wasn’t religious. So thank you for your thoughts, but he’s f — ing dead.” (Rich Tillman cited in Knapp, supra) So Rich has decided to believe?

““I’ll tell you something more strange,” Richard says, lifting his face as he blows cigarette smoke out of the corner of his mouth. “After listening to this (expletive) at Dad’s, I said to Bailey on the way here, ‘I don’t care what anyone says. I think my brother was (expletive) murdered.’” (Rich Tillman cited in Katie Halper, Pat Tillman Remembered By Mother In New Book, Take Part, 4 May 2008)

The brother was murdered. Everyone agrees. So Rich Tillman believes the warnings now?

Oh, no, he’s smoking Jewish cigarettes. These packages have plenty of warning labels. But he doesn’t believe. “There will be feeble protests.” “But he is now completely in the grasp of these Jews. They are his masters. And his weakness, his vacillation, his want of principle, compel him, even with his eyes open, to be their most unwilling instrument and tool.” (Gordon Calthrop, The warnings and encouragements of Passion-week and Easter-day, sermons, Wertheim, Macintosh, and Hunt, 1862,p 113)

Pat read the Bible. He knew about Jewish practices. But he didn’t believe either. “The warning flags were just pushed aside”. (Marcy Gordon, Madoff scandal, SEC role under scrutiny, AP, 6 Jan 2009)

So one went the quick way, and the brother is going the slow way. As Jewish singer Debbie Harry puts it: “One way or another, I’m gonna find ya’ I’m gonna get ya’, get ya’, get ya’, get ya’” (Debbie Harry, Blondie, One Way or Another Lyrics)

“If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.”  (Jesus cited in Mark 7:16, Holy Bible)

And if not.

Well, then you can be like Pat and Rich, and the gentlemen pictured at right. They just don’t believe.

EVIL PEOPLE ON WICKED MISSION TO KILL THE UNWARY

At this time of year, the evil work of the terrorists gets a lot of press. They’ve been killing people left and right.

“Mourners in the US gathered Friday to remember the nearly 3,000 people killed in the Sep 11, 2001 terrorist attacks“.

AND THEY’RE STILL ACTIVE!

Jewish president Barack Obama: “We remember with reverence the lives we lost”. “Let us renew our resolve against those who perpetrated this barbaric act and who plot against us still. In defence of our nation, we will never waver.” (US remembers 9/11 attacks in sombre ceremonies, DPA, 11 Sep 2009)

YOU SEE, THERE’S A BIG PLOT GOING ON

So there are people who plot against Americans? Who would actually kill millions and millions of Americans?

There are! Barack Obama was right!
“The Tobacco Atlas, Third Edition, published by the American Cancer Society and World Lung Foundation, estimates that tobacco use kills some six million people each year- more than a third of whom will die from cancer- and drains US$500 billion annually from global economies.” (Hana Ross, Judith Mackay, Omar Shafey, Michael Eriksen, The Tobacco Atlas Online, American Cancer Society and World Lung Foundation, http://www.tobaccoatlas.org/tobaccoatlas/press.html)

LOSSES OF THIS SIZE MERIT MEMORIALS AND MINUTES OF SILENCE

We know that when six million people get wiped out, its a really big thing. Special groups have special words for it, and no one can forget their suffering.

Less than 3 000 casualties in New York merits a special day of mourning, and even a minute of silence in the White House, so when will they get around to a memorial for the six million annual victims of this terrible business?

SO WHAT ABOUT PREVENTING THIS TERROR?

How about defending the victims, so they don’t have to die? After all, “In defence of our nation, we will never waver.” (Barack Obama cited in US remembers 9/11 attacks in sombre ceremonies, DPA, 11 Sep 2009)

Good news! The intel crews have been working around the clock to find the source of this evil plot. Naturally, intelligence doesn’t come cheap.

MOUNTAINS OF MONEY

“Consistent with Section 601 of the “Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007,” Public Law 110-53, the Director of National Intelligence is disclosing to the public the aggregate amount of funds appropriated by Congress to the National Intelligence Program (NIP) for fiscal year 2008 not later than 30 days after the end of the fiscal year.

The aggregate amount appropriated to the NIP for fiscal year 2008 was $47.5 Billion.” (OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, DNI Releases Budget Figure for 2008 National Intelligence Program, New Release, 28 Oct 2008 )

CAREFULLY SPENT

That’s a lot of money. Some of the things it was spent on include drills and guns for that special “enduring freedom”: “CIA interrogators carried out mock executions and threatened an al Qaeda commander with a gun and an electric drill, according to an internal report that provides new details of abuses inside’s the agency’s secret prisons, two leading U.S. newspapers reported on Saturday.” (Anthony Boadle, CIA report has new details of prisoner abuse – media, Reuters, 23 Aug 2009)

TO OBTAIN SENSATIONAL SECRETS!!!!

But the torture program yielded important intelligence information: The tobacco business was being plotted from — CAVES IN AFGHANISTAN!!!

LOOKING FOR TOBACCO EXECUTIVES IN AFGHAN CAVES — YEAR AFTER YEAR

And so the US special forces troops deployed to the caves with their special equipment. Maybe they could find secret tobacco cultivation deep in the Afghan mountains!!

Well, special forces has been active in Afghanistan for 8 years. And the threat is over? They’ve succeeded in their mission?

Not according to Mr. Obama. Those evil people are still plotting: “those who perpetrated this barbaric act and who plot against us still.” (US remembers 9/11 attacks in sombre ceremonies, DPA, 11 Sep 2009)

BARBARIC PLOTTERS MAKE OFF WITH TON OF MONEY

Maybe that $47.5 billion per year for intelligence information has been a total waste. And all that torture?

Its been barbaric. Barbaric means “Marked by crudeness or lack of restraint in taste, style, or manner.” (Barbaric, answers.com) And those “who plot against us still” (as per Obama, supra)? They’ve succeeded.

The plotters in the intelligence community have plotted, and succeeded, in getting billions of dollars for information that the threat came from the caves.

MAKE THAT ANOTHER SIX MILLION THIS YEAR, AND THE SAME NEXT YEAR

And “the plotters” (as per Obama, supra) in the tobacco business?

“Jews were especially well represented in certain industries, and by 1872 they owned 90 percent of the distilleries … and 49 percent of the tobacco industry”. (Paul Magocsi, A history of Ukraine, University of Toronto Press, 1996, p 338) “Jews also manufactured cigars and cigarettes; the P. Lorillard tobacco company was founded by Jews.” (Jon Bloomberg, The Jewish world in the modern age, KTAV Publishing House, 2004, p 215)

HE SAYS

“In defence of our nation, we will never waver.” (Barack Obama cited in US remembers 9/11 attacks in sombre ceremonies, DPA, 11 Sep 2009)

So the Jewish president is outlawing the tobacco trade?

BUT REALLY

“Tobacco costs the Defense Department more than $1.6 billion a year in medical care and lost work days, while the Veterans Administration has spent more than $5 billion to treat veterans for tobacco-related illnesses.” (U.S. Troops Criticize Proposal That Would Ban Smoking in Military, AP, 29 Aug 2009)

Its a “threat”. And this threat kills six million a year.

But while the boys are busy commemorating those less than 3 000 victims from 2001, the grim reaper stays busy.

NOT IN THE CAVES

For eight years, American special forces soldiers have been searching the caves of Afghanistan, but, according to Barack Obama, evil terrorist masterminds are still plotting harm to Americans. (US remembers 9/11 attacks in sombre ceremonies, DPA, 11 Sep 2009)

SO WHERE DO THESE EVIL MASTERMINDS DEPLOY THEIR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION?

Since the terrorist masterminds are not in the caves, where are they? Where do they have their weapons of mass destruction deployed?

WHO DEALS DEATH TO THE TROOPS

American “military commissaries still sell cigarettes at heavily discounted prices.” (U.S. Troops Criticize Proposal That Would Ban Smoking in Military, AP, 29 Aug 2009)

CREATIVE POWERHOUSE

Mr. Donald Boström is an unusually talented independent photographer, film maker, author, etc., etc.

In addition to authoritative works on the global AIDS situation, Mr. Boström has done expert works in the area of wine blending, coffees, cooking, etc., etc. http://www.donaldbostrom.com/

He is a scholar with an international reach.

WHO HAS SEEN, AND PHOTOGRAPHED, THE WORLD

A reach so extensive that it went right into the occupied area of Palestine.

This is a place where the Jewish occupiers take the position that olive trees should be uprooted and sold for the wood in Tel Aviv. http://www.chris-on-the-bike.de/eappi_uprooting01.htm

Be sure to check the link to see the pictures of an uprooting ceremony. An act of senseless destruction witnessed by Donald Boström.

GOOD MEN SUPPORTED BY INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED EXPERT

Now its one thing if Ecumenical Accompaniers like Christoph Gocke are present. They’re a nuisance to the Jewish occupiers, but certainly something the Jews can live with.

But then there’s a Donald Boström. He writes an article, or makes a film, and his enormous credibility ensures a respectful hearing worldwide.

Consider his 17 August 2009 article in the Swedish paper Aftonbladet.

The topic is a really nasty one. The people of Palestine allege that the Jews are plundering the organs of their children. Organs like kidneys.

Back in 1992, Donald Boström was in Palestine working on a book. On multiple occasions, a UN worker contacted him to advise that the Jews were killing Arabs and gutting them for organs.

And so he traveled around the West Bank and Gaza for a television company interviewing families who thought their sons had been gutted of organs prior to being killed.

“På uppdrag av ett tv-bolag reste jag därefter runt och talade med ett stort antal palestinska familjer på Västbanken och Gaza som menade att deras söner blivit bestulna på organ innan de dödades.” (Donald Boström, Våra söner plundras på sina organ, Aftonbladet, 17 Aug 2009)

CASE STUDY

Sons like Bilal Achmed Ghanan. He had been involved in activities like stone throwing in resistance to the Jewish occupation. And so the Jewish special forces laid down an ambush. When Bilal showed up, they shot him in the chest. Then a shot in each leg. And then, when the boy was down, they popped over and fired a bullet into his stomach.

“Lt. Aldo Raine: The German will be sickened by us, the German will talk about us, and the German will fear us.” (Memorable quotes for
Inglourious Basterds (2009), The Internet Movie Database)

WHO WILL CARE FOR THIS INJURED ARAB?

UN and Red Crescent staff were in the area, and rushed over to the scene of the shooting. They were all ready to take care of the seriously injured Bilal.

But the Jews had other plans. They put Bilal into a military jeep, and drove this boy to the edge of the village, where a Jewish military helicopter was waiting.

Five days later, as night was falling, the Jewish special forces brought Bilal home. He was dead.

Friends and relatives involved in the burial noticed that Bilal had been opened up — from abdomen to throat, and then sewn shut again. The Arab people of Palestine are pretty sure that organ harvesting is going on.

JEWISH ORGAN TRAFFICKER

Sourcing the organs for men like Levy Izhak Rosenbaum. He called himself a “matchmaker”, and bought organs for $10 000 from connected people in Israel, reselling these items for $160 000 in the United States.

Mr. Rosenbaum made his statements on tape to federal agents in New Jersey. He mentioned that he had arranged “quite a lot” of matches, and had never failed to satisfy a request.

So, where were these organs coming from?

“Lt. Aldo Raine: You probably heard we ain’t in the prisoner-takin’ business; we in the killin’ Nazi business. And cousin, Business is a-boomin’.” (Memorable quotes for
Inglourious Basterds (2009), The Internet Movie Database)

Were civic-minded Jews in Israel voluntarily donating their vital organs to their brethren in the United States?

HARVARD PROFESSOR: ILLEGAL TRADE IN ORGANS

Harvard Professor Francis Delmonici estimates that 10% of the 63 000 kidney transplants worldwide use illegally-sourced organs. From countries like Pakistan, the Philippines, and China, where the organs are apparently harvested from executed prisoners.

SO WHY NOT GET THIS CHECKED OUT?

Donald Boström thinks the situation needs an independent investigation from the International Court of Justice.

HISTORY OF ILLEGAL ORGAN TRAFFICKING

France terminated organ transplant cooperation with Israel in the 1990s on grounds of Israel’s unethical conduct. Half of the kidneys that Israelis have received in transplants were sourced illegally from Turkey, Eastern Europa, and South America. Probably because the physicians in Israel have never taken a stand against illegal organ trafficking. In fact, the top doctors at the largest hospitals play a leading role in illegally-sourced organ transplants.

The organs are bought illegally because Israel has an acute shortage of organs for transplant. Back in 1992, Ehud Olmert launched a public campaign for more donors. At the same time, young Arab men were getting killed by the Jewish special forces, and were returned to their villages for burial five days later. (Boström, supra)

JUST SOME FACTS

Mr. Boström just presented facts: 1) young Arab men are being killed on an ongoing basis by Jewish special forces in Palestine, 2) Israel is short of organs, 3) Jews have trafficked “quite a lot” of organs for “a long time”, 4) many of the dead Arab men are returned 5 days later for burial after having been “opened up”.

All of these facts are undisputed.

DID THEY WELCOME THE OPPORTUNITY TO CLEAR THEIR NAME?

And the government in Israel said, “Yes, absolutely, let’s have an independent investigation from the International Court of Justice. These allegations are all baseless, and we want to clear our name!!”?

Not quite.

ACCUSATIONS

“The Foreign Ministry reacted angrily on Tuesday to the report. Ministry spokesperson Yigal Palmor said the newspaper’s decision to publish the story is “a mark of disgrace” for the Swedish press.

¹Then the whole assembly rose and led him off to Pilate. ²And they began to accuse him, saying, “We have found this man subverting our nation. He opposes payment of taxes to Caesar and claims to be Christ, a king.” Luke 23

WOULD THEY REALLY MURDER?

“In a democratic country, there should be no place for dark blood libels out of the Middle Ages of this type,” Palmor said.

⁴²Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and now am here. I have not come on my own; but he sent me. ⁴³Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say. ⁴⁴You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. John 8

LOUD SHOUTS AND INSISTENT CONDEMNATION

“This is an article that shames Swedish democracy and the entire Swedish press.”

A Foreign Ministry official said that Israel’s embassy in Stockholm have communicated a harsh condemnation to the Swedish government and the newspaper itself.” (Morten Berthelsen and Barak Ravid, Top Sweden newspaper says IDF kills Palestinians for their organs, Haaretz, 22 Aug 2009)

²⁰Wanting to release Jesus, Pilate appealed to them again. ²¹But they kept shouting, “Crucify him! Crucify him!”

²²For the third time he spoke to them: “Why? What crime has this man committed? I have found in him no grounds for the death penalty. Therefore I will have him punished and then release him.”

²³But with loud shouts they insistently demanded that he be crucified, and their shouts prevailed. ²⁴So Pilate decided to grant their demand. Luke 23

ITS NOT THAT THE FACTS WERE WRONG

Note that they’re not denying that young men like Bilal Achmed Ghanan are being shot down in cold blood, flown away in helicopters, and slit open. These people are not denying that Levy Izhak Rosenbaum was Jewish, and involved in organ trafficking for years.

Has this house, which bears my Name, become a den of robbers to you? But I have been watching! declares the LORD. (Jeremiah 7:11, Holy Bible)

None of the specific facts are attacked.

So, why not get that independent judicial investigation? Clear the name of the Jewish people once and for all of these “dark blood libels”?

No, there’s been a harsh condemnation.

INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATIONS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN RISKY FOR THESE PEOPLE

The reason is not too hard to figure out. These investigations have, historically, often gone against the Jewish people.

‘There is no doubt that the uniformity of the defendant’s confessions, contradicted only by variants and incongruities generally relating to details of secondary importance, was assumed by the judges and so-called “public opinion” to constitute “proof” that the Jews, characterized by their great mobility and widespread dispersion, practiced horrible, murderous rituals“. (Ariel Toaff, Pasque di sangue, translated by Gian Marco Lucchese and Pietro Gianetti located at http://www.bloodpassover.com/, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2007, p 7)

“Professor Ariel Toaff is among Israel’s and the world’s senior researchers in medieval Jewish communities and the Italian Jewish community.” (Bar-Ilan University Spokesman, BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY STATEMENT ON PROFESSOR ARIEL TOAFF’S RESEARCH REGARDING BLOOD LIBELS, IPR Strategic Business Information Database, February 12, 2007)

But these reports might be all “libel”? Made-up stories?

THE VALUE OF A CHRISTIAN BAPTISM

“In those days, the great majority of the Jewish population of Magonza, after uselessly seeking refuge in the bishop’s palace, met death in an indiscriminate massacre. Few of their lives were spared. Among them, Isacco, the sacristan of the synagogue, had personally been compelled to accept conversion to Christianity.

AND AFTER HIS BAPTISM, HE BECAME A “NEW CREATION”?

But after a few days, the poor convert, assailed by remorse and repentance, dreamed up a delirious ritual of expiation based on a series of human sacrifices intended to move the Eternal to vengeance in a bath of blood.

BAPTISM DIDN’T WORK

First of all, Isaac, seized by fervent hallucinations, put his mother to death, burning her alive in her house. He then dragged his children, “not yet of an age capable of discerning good from evil” into the synagogue. Here, on the pulpit, the almemor, before the Ark containing the rolls of the Law, with his own hands, he slaughtered them all, one by one, offering a sacrifice to God. “And as the blood of the unhappy children spurted from their mortal wounds, painting the door-posts of the Ark of the Law, the sacristan devoutly recited: “May this blood serve as an expiration for all my sins”. Immediately afterwards, he set fire to the synagogue, running from one side of the hall to another, his hands raised to Heaven in an act of prayer, his chanting voice clearly audible outside the holy sanctuary. And among the flames, before the holy Ark, the miserable Isacco finally found the death he so desired (11).

A “WHOLESOME AND UPRIGHT” JEW

A psychopath? A lunatic suffering from homicidal religious fits of insanity? A poor soul driven mad by desperation and seized by a self-destructive mania? A madman and masochistic fanatic? The anonymous author who reports this tragic tale has absolutely no doubt at all of this kind: Isacco was a “wholesome and upright person, pious, merciful, and God-fearing”. His behavior deserved to be pointed out as an example to later generations, and all types of censure in this case were to be considered absolutely unjustified and inopportune. Isacco had decided to sacrifice his own children on the almemor, before the Ark of the Law, the holiest place in the synagogue, according to a ritual, recalling, on the one hand, the holocaust offered on the altar of the Temple of Jerusalem, and, on the other hand, the Biblical sacrifice of Isaac, which, according to the Midrash, had actually been carried out. The grisly example of the pious sacristan of Magonza appeared to inspire enthusiastic and zealous imitators. The synagogue was thus transformed, in time, itself into a sort of sacred slaughterhouse, in which, among moans and prayers, the blood of the women and children, sacrificed for the love of God, gushed forth in torrents: Holy Ark, pulpit, women’s gallery, benches and steps were all stained red, as was the altar of the Temple.” (Toaff, supra, pp 191, 192)

SYDSVENSKAN:

“After all we all know what they [the Jews] are like, don’t we: inhuman, hardened. Capable of anything,” the opinion piece says.” (Berthelsen, supra)

Certainly the Sydsvenskan takes a harsh position on the Jewish people. But could they really be capable of “anything”?

“Lt. Aldo Raine: My name is Lt. Aldo Raine and I’m putting together a special team, and I need me eight soldiers. Eight Jewish-American soldiers. Now, y’all might’ve heard rumors about the armada happening soon. Well, we’ll be leaving a little earlier. We’re gonna be dropped into France, dressed as civilians. And once we’re in enemy territory, as a bushwhackin’ guerrilla army, we’re gonna be doin’ one thing and one thing only… killin’ Nazis. Now, I don’t know about y’all, but I sure as hell didn’t come down from the goddamn Smoky Mountains, cross five thousand miles of water, fight my way through half of Sicily and jump out of a fuckin’ air-o-plane to teach the Nazis lessons in humanity. Nazi ain’t got no humanity.” (Memorable quotes for
Inglourious Basterds (2009), The Internet Movie Database)

As Peter the Venerable, the Abbott of Cluny, put it: “Really I doubt whether a Jew can be human for he will neither yield to human reasoning, nor find satisfaction in authoritative utterances, alike divine and Jewish”. (Jonathan D. Sarna, American Judaism: A History, Yale University Press, 2004, p 62)

“They’re the foot soldiers of a Jew-hatin’, mass murderin’ maniac and they need to be dee-stroyed. That’s why any and every every son of a bitch we find wearin’ a Nazi uniform, they’re gonna die. Now, I’m the direct descendant of the mountain man Jim Bridger. That means I got a little Injun in me. And our battle plan will be that of an Apache resistance. We will be cruel to the Germans, and through our cruelty they will know who we are. And they will find the evidence of our cruelty in the disemboweled, dismembered, and disfigured bodies of their brothers we leave behind us. And the German won’t not be able to help themselves but to imagine the cruelty their brothers endured at our hands, and our boot heels, and the edge of our knives. And the German will be sickened by us, and the German will talk about us, and the German will fear us. And when the German closes their eyes at night and they’re tortured by their subconscious for the evil they have done, it will be with thoughts of us they are tortured with. Sound good? The Basterds: YES, SIR!
Lt. Aldo Raine: That’s what I like to hear. But I got a word of warning for all you would-be warriors. When you join my command, you take on debit. A debit you owe me personally. Each and every man under my command owes me one hundred Nazi scalps. And I want my scalps. And all y’all will git me one hundred Nazi scalps, taken from the heads of one hundred dead Nazis.” (Memorable quotes for
Inglourious Basterds (2009), The Internet Movie Database)

“The grisly example of the pious sacristan of Magonza appeared to inspire enthusiastic and zealous imitators. The synagogue was thus transformed, in time, itself into a sort of sacred slaughterhouse, in which, among moans and prayers, the blood of the women and children, sacrificed for the love of God, gushed forth in torrents: Holy Ark, pulpit, women’s gallery, benches and steps were all stained red, as was the altar of the Temple.” (Toaff, supra, pp 191, 192)

But wasn’t that all hundreds of years ago?

“Sgt. Werner Rachtman: You can’t expect me to divulge information that would put German lives in danger?
Lt. Aldo Raine: Well Werner, that’s where you’re wrong, because that’s exactly what I expect. I need to about Germans hiding in them trees, and you need to tell me, and you need to tell me. And you need to tell me right now. Now take your finger and point out on this map where this party’s being held, how many’s coming, and what they brought to play with.
Sgt. Werner Rachtman: I respectfully refuse.
Lt. Aldo Raine: [a smack is heard offscreen] Here that? That’s Sgt. Donny Donowitz. But you might know him better by his nickname. The Bear Jew. Now, if you heard of Aldo the Apache, you gotta have heard of the Bear Jew.
Sgt. Werner Rachtman: I have heard of the Bear Jew.
Lt. Aldo Raine: What did you hear about him, Werner?
Sgt. Werner Rachtman: He beats German soldiers with a club
Lt. Aldo Raine: He bashes their brains in with a baseball bat is what he does. Now, Werner, I’m gonna ask you one more goddamn time, and if you still “respectfully refuse,” I’m callin’ the Bear Jew over here, and he’s gonna take that big-ole bat of his, and he’s gonna beat you to death with it. Now take your wiener schnitzel lickin’ finger and point out on this map what I want to know.
Sgt. Werner Rachtman: Fuck you.
[pause]
Sgt. Werner Rachtman: And your Jew dogs!
[the Basterds all laugh]
Lt. Aldo Raine: Actually, Werner, we’re all tickled to here you say that. Frankly, watchin’ Donny beat Nazis to death is is the closest we ever get to goin’ to the movies.
[Calling offscreen]
Lt. Aldo Raine: DONNY!
Sgt. Donny Donowitz: [From offscreen] Yeah?
Lt. Aldo Raine: We got a German here who wants to die for his country! Oblige him!” (Memorable quotes for
Inglourious Basterds (2009), The Internet Movie Database)

So now you know why Donald Boström’s suggestion for an independent judicial inquiry has been so poorly received.

“Defenders of the opium trade continued to argue that Britain only sold opium because the Chinese demanded it, and claimed that if they withdrew, then someone else would take over.” (Carl A. Trocki, Opium, Empire and the Global Political Economy: A Study of the Asian Opium Trade, Routledge, 1999, p 135)

RATIONALIZING THE SALE OF DANGEROUS DRUGS

Of course, opium is just a drug. Here, we studied the production and sales aspects of the opium business.

“In India, where Parsi, Armenian, Jewish and Muslim firms had always played an important role in the opium trade, the competitive advantage of being white disappeared”. (Carl A. Trocki, Opium, Empire and the Global Political Economy: A Study of the Asian Opium Trade, Routledge, 1999, p 109)

Opium is a drug with no benefit other than “good feelings”, and significant health hazards. Just like the drug nicotine.

And if you ask the sales people, why are you selling these dangerous products, they’ll explain: because smokers want to buy these cigarettes, and if I don’t sell them at my supermarket, they’ll just take their business down the street.

Times change; the excuses don’t. Money; not morals.

“It should be noted that many firms engaged in the business of importing Indian opium to China and did not wish to see the trade end”. (Kathleen L. Lodwick, Crusaders against Opium: Protestant Missionaries in China, 1874-1917, Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1996, p 168)

Let’s say a person wants a good feeling, without having done the hard work to get it the natural way. Nothing easier than the drug way.

Hard day at work? Stretch out in front of the television, and let that drug do its work.

Drug? Television?

Very addictive, as shown at the link. No benefits. Other than that feeling of being entertained.

“When Ahmet was overthrown for corruption in 1829, the Sassoons fled to Bombay, India, the strategic trade route to India and gateway to the Far East. Soon the British government granted Sassoon “monopoly rights” to the manufacture of cotton goods, silk and most importantly, Opium – at that time the most addictive drug in the world!” (Khondakar Golam Mowla, The Judgment Against Imperialism, Fascism and Racism Against Caliphate and Islam: Volume 1, AuthorHouse, 2008, p 664)

But for the addict, he’s back again the next day for his next fix.

Or let’s say the health is down, but instead of eating healthy foods, resting well, and spending time outdoors each day, a woman wants healthy-LOOKING skin the easy way. No easier method than to paint up with some cosmetics.

And the benefits? Just a good feeling. For a while.

But, as with any of these other dangerous drugs, cosmetics has a downside. Cancer.

MANY COSMETIC PRODUCTS CAUSE SERIOUS DAMAGE

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in women today (after lung cancer) and is the most common cancer among women, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers. According to the American Cancer Society, about 1.3 million women will be diagnosed with breast cancer annually worldwide. About 465,000 will die from the disease. (Breast Cancer: Statistics on Incidence, Survival, and Screening, Imaginis.com)

“In the year 1836 the trade increased to over 30,000 chests and drug addiction became endemic in coastal cities.” (Khondakar Golam Mowla, The Judgment Against Imperialism, Fascism and Racism Against Caliphate and Islam: Volume 1, AuthorHouse, 2008, p 664)

“Breast cancer is the 7th leading cause of mortality in the United States and results in approximately 41,000 deaths each year.” (Suzanne Price, American Society for Nutrition, Unhealthful Relation Between Animal Foods And Breast Cancer Not Supported By Studies, Medical News Today, 17 Aug 2009)

This often fatal disease generally strikes women.

Some of them think medical science holds the answer. Like the members of the Lake Harriet Happy Hoofers for Healthy Hooters. Melanie McCall is one of the members of this elite strike force. They’re planning a fund-raising walk. “Every walker has to raise $2,300 for research to be able to participate. The Lake Harriet team has passed $40,000.”(Liz Collin, Mothers Band Together For Breast Cancer 3-Day, WCCO, 17 Aug 2009) And how do these women approach their work? Pictures speak volumes. They tie on their healthy walking shoes, strap on their bras (as pictured), and top it all off with a pink t-shirt.

And what will all this expensive research bring? “”We’re out walking so that other girls, other moms, other sisters, other friends won’t have to go on a breast cancer walk 10 or 15 years from now.” McCall said.” (Collin, supra)

AN EXPENSIVE UNDERTAKING

“Whenever you hear the term, “medical research”, you must realize that whatever the alleged research is, it is very expensive. Glassware, chemicals, the salaries of technicians and physicians, laboratories and parking lots, all cost a lot of money.” (Dr. Wu Tao-Wei, The Fraud of Genetic Research) The research people will burn through that $40 000 pretty quickly.

IS MORE RESEARCH REALLY SO NECESSARY?

So many forms of cancer are related to something known as lifestyle. (Price, supra)

Ah, maybe the cause is already known? As we discovered here, bra use is a significant cause of breast cancer. So women could burn their bras, and avoid cancer? Its that simple?

BUT THE CANCER BUSINESS IS A PROFITABLE BUSINESS

But where would the profits go. Those sweatshop owners can produce a bra for 50 cents, or maybe sew on a cute pink ribbon for another 10 cents. Sell the same thing for $20 later, and there’s plenty of profit. Plus, of course, all those cancer “therapies”.

But there’s more to this game than bras. The girls of the Happy Hoofers are also painted up with cosmetics.

CARCINOGENIC INGREDIENTS

“There is no question that people are being damaged by their cosmetics. So many things are put into cosmetics now that are carcinogenic, and it is allowed because cosmetics are not considered to be as serious as drugs or food. One of the most extreme cases I have seen was a woman whose bone marrow was affected by chemicals used in hair dye. The situation as it is is plainly dangerous – unacceptably so.” (Dr. Jean Munro, medical director of the Breakspear Hospital in Hertfordshire cited in Tim Utton, Daily Mail, April 8, 2002, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/health/thehealthnews.html?in_article_id=108549&in_page_id=1797)

WHAT’S REALLY GOING ON

[15] He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.
[16] But whereunto shall I liken this generation? It is like unto children sitting in the markets [all those shopoholics], and calling unto their fellows,
[17] And saying, We have piped unto you [advertising], and ye have not danced; we have mourned unto you, and ye have not lamented. …
[19] … But wisdom is justified of her children. (Jesus, cited in Matthew 11, Holy Bible)

There’s plenty of information out there. “there is considerable evidence that breast cancer risk is related to modifiable lifestyle factors”. (Price, supra) Dr. Munro speaks as an expert. And we’ve cited plenty of other experts.

And “this generation”? They’ve gotten their health information. But like to spend their time “sitting in the markets” — you know, those stores where they can buy their cosmetics, bras, cigarettes, sun tanning lotions, etc.

They’re getting bored, but they’re also getting worried. Sure there’s entertainment out there, on their large televisions where they can get huge advertisements for their favorite consumer products. But somehow they know something is wrong.

And so they go on their fund-raising walks, and then off to the shops for a little more blush.

And these products really contains hazardous ingredients? The State of California says so: “The primary purpose of the California Safe Cosmetics Program is to collect information on hazardous and potentially hazardous ingredients in cosmetic products sold in California and to make it available to the public.” (California Safe Cosmetics Program, Occupational Health Branch, State of California) Just like those cigarette warning labels.

“The Jewish Encyclopedia of 1905, states that Sassoon expanded his opium trade into China and Japan. He placed his eight sons in charge of the major opium exchanges in China. According to the 1944 Jewish Encyclopedia: “He employed only Jews in his business, and wherever he sent them he built synagogues and schools for them. He imported whole families of fellow Jews … and put them to work.”" (Khondakar Golam Mowla, The Judgment Against Imperialism, Fascism and Racism Against Caliphate and Islam: Volume 1, AuthorHouse, 2008, p 664)

But wisdom is justified of her children

Of course, there will always be some wise people out there. People like
California State Senator Carole Migden.

She knows about the dangers of cosmetics, and thought it was wrong that the dangerous ingredients were not disclosed. “It is beyond belief that a consumer is not told whether he or she is putting carcinogens on their skin, in their hair or on their face”. (Mary Ann Swissler, Is silence golden? California grassroots activists get a big win, but where was the American Cancer Society?, Sacramento News and Review, March 11, 2005, http://www.newsreview.com/sacramento/Content?oid=44446)

SHINING THE LIGHT ONTO SOME VERY DARK MATTERS

She worked to get a law passed in California called the California Safe Cosmetics Act of 2005. The cosmetics companies are required to tell consumers about cancer-causing chemicals used in cosmetics. (id.)

“In a landmark advance in the safety of cosmetics products, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has signed SB 484, the California Safe Cosmetics Act of 2005. The decision caps a two year campaign by Breast Cancer Action, the Breast Cancer Fund, and the National Environmental Trust to bring additional scrutiny to an industry accustomed to only minimal oversight.” (Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, Governor Signs Safe Cosmetics Bill, 8 Oct 2005)

DECEPTION, TRICKERY, AND CANCER — BUT HUGE PROFITS

And how did the industry feel about disclosing what poisons they use?

The act “survived a fierce lobbying effort. Industry lobbyists outnumbered, outspent, but this time couldn’t out-argue the pro-SB484 coalition.” (Swissler, supra)

“Members of the Sassoon family were most vocal in protesting to British officials every attempt by the Chinese to stop the trade.” (Kathleen L. Lodwick, Crusaders against Opium: Protestant Missionaries in China, 1874-1917, Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1996, p 168)

“The chemical and cosmetic industries both vigorously opposed the bill, mounting a major campaign to convince salon owners and workers that they would be shut down if the new law passed. The cosmetics industry spent heavily to defeat SB 484. Proctor and Gamble paid Sacramento lobbyists more than $90,000 in the first six months of 2005, and the Cosmetics, Toiletries and Fragrance Association (CTFA) spent more than $600,000 in the 2003-04 legislative session and the first quarter of 2005 to oppose SB 484 and other environmental health legislation in California.” (Campaign, supra)

“Quite often they were disappointed by the lack of vigor on the part of the consular officials to whom they complained, and they frequently resorted to appeals to more senior officials in London.” (Kathleen L. Lodwick, Crusaders against Opium: Protestant Missionaries in China, 1874-1917, Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1996, p 168)

They didn’t come out and say, No, our products don’t use poisonous chemicals. They just don’t want to have to inform consumers when they do!

Barbara Brenner was the executive director of Breast Cancer Action in San Francisco. She was pushing for the Cosmetics Act. (Swissler, supra)

BARBARA BRENNER HAS ALREADY DONE “THE RESEARCH”

““The passage of this bill is a huge step forward for people who care about why so many people have cancer and other health problems,” said Brenner. “We overcame enormous opposition from a very well-funded cosmetics industry, and we have them on the run.”” (Swissler, supra)

Brenner knows a lot about breast cancer. Usually women get the disease. Cosmetics contain cancer-causing chemicals. The companies don’t want customers to know which ones.

And then after a woman gets cancer, she can lose her hair in treatment, and shrivel up as she dies. But at least these women can stay painted up to the end!

“SB484’s chief opponent, the Cosmetics, Toiletries and Fragrances Association (CTFA) gives $10 million annually to ACS’s “Look Good, Feel Better” makeup program for cancer patients. Conducted worldwide, it provides makeup, wigs and individual styling sessions for recovering cancer patients, according to their Web site. They also reach out to teens; male cancer patients; Spanish-speaking patients; and use 25,000 hairstylists, wig experts, estheticians, makeup artists and nail technicians who volunteer their services.” (Swissler, supra)

Consider a woman who gets cancer from cosmetics. She pays a lot of money to get the disease. And then the industry gives her more cosmetics. Keep that pale, sick face painted up to date!

What? Hair gone? No problem, girl, here’s a wig!

CAUSED BY DOING THINGS THE ADVERTISEMENTS TELL YOU ARE GOOD

The tobacco business, the bra business, and, of course, cosmetics, have a lot in common. Check the links, and you’ll see that while, out there in the wild world of journalism and medicine, there’s much talk of “medical research” to “find the cause of cancer”, these matters are simpler than the cancer industry would like for you to believe.

“This was harvest time for David Sassoon & Sons. The Yangtze mud glinted with gold as soon as they laid a brick in it.” “Their wharves and godowns were bursting with opium”. (Carl A. Trocki, Opium, Empire and the Global Political Economy: A Study of the Asian Opium Trade, Routledge, 1999, p 115)

BUT ARE REALLY BAD

As the Medical News puts it: “Although genetic factors are important, there is considerable evidence that breast cancer risk is related to modifiable lifestyle factors, such as physical activity, body weight, alcohol intake, and dietary choices.” (Price, supra)

MERCHANTS OF DEATH

“The Jewish Encyclopedia of 1905, states that Sassoon expanded his opium trade into China and Japan. He placed his eight sons in charge of the major opium exchanges in China.” (Khondakar Golam Mowla, The Judgment Against Imperialism, Fascism and Racism Against Caliphate and Islam: Volume 1, AuthorHouse, 2008, p 664)

BUT AT LEAST THE DRUG BUSINESS IS PROFITABLE

Physical activity? How much time does a person spend with a television addiction? Body weight? Junk food and refined sugars, plus that television time. Alcohol? Drugs again.

What we’re seeing here is that drug addiction — whether alcohol, television, or junk foods — has been identified as a major cause of these 465 000 deaths per year.

Yes, these industries only sell their drugs because people want them (they say). People like the Happy Hoofers.

These girls know about the statistics on breast cancer. And so they paint up, slip on those pink shirts, and hit the streets to raise money for research.

But “wisdom is justified of her children” (as per Jesus, supra). There are some women out there who know what’s going on, and thanks to the sterling work of Carole Migden, Barbara Brenner, and so many others, more will know.

And maybe, just maybe, one day the market for these dangerous products will dry up. Because people are informed, and no longer buy them.

UPDATES EVERY 10 to 15 DAYS

Iran-based agitator and wanna-be politician Mir Hossein Mousavi recently visited a “graveside commemoration for protesters killed in violence that followed the re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.” (Riot police beat Tehran mourners, AFP, 31 Jul 2009) Violence organized and financed by Mousavi’s support-staff at the English embassy. Replete with “special” support from the American special forces snipers. These men managed to shoot down Neda Soltan, and now it was time for a special memorial service in the cemetary.

Mr. Mousavi wanted to visit the gravesite to “recite the Koran verses said on such occasions”. (id.) So he must be Islamic, right?

WHEN A CONVERSION IS NO CONVERSION AT ALL

As usual, we consult the top authority in these matters, Dr. Raphael Patai, who has written a book about the depth and sincerity of the Jewish conversion experience in Persia (Iran today): “In 1656, the Shah ordered all Jews in his kingdom to become Muslims. After the forced conversion, the newly Islamized Jews became known as Jadīd al-Islām (literally, “New of Islam”) … Many of them, however, remained faithful to Judaism and lived a life of crypto-Jews, secret Jews, not unlike the Marranos in the Iberian Peninsula after their forced conversion to Christianity in 1492.” (Raphael Patai, Jadīd al-Islām, Wayne State University Press, 1997, p 16) Since “Even if an individual born to Jewish parents takes the step of formally converting to another religion, he does not thereby automatically cease being Jewish.” (Raphael Patai, The Jewish Mind, 1996, Wayne State University Press, p 16)

Dr. Patai had a thorough understanding of the Jewish people:
“After studying at the University of Breslau Rabbinical Seminary and receiving a doctorate and a rabbinical diploma from the University of Budapest, he followed his own Zionist impulses and studied at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, where he received the university’s first doctorate, in 1936.” (Robert Thomas, Raphael Patai, 85, a Scholar of Jewish and Arab Cultures, New York Times, 25 Jul 1996)

ALL THOSE MILLIONS

Mr. Mousavi has also been “following his own Zionist impulses”: “Mousavi has accused Iran’s government of rigging the election in favour of hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.” (Iran blames U.S. for bitter post-election dispute – Supporters of reformist leader Mir Hossein Mousavi gather in Tehran, CBC, 17 Jun 2009) No evidence, mind you. But an accusation.

Just from Mr. Mousavi? Of course not. Since there are “millions of opponents who claim the vote was rigged”. (Ali Dareini and Brian Murphy, Iran president confirmed without symbolic kiss, AP, 4 Aug 2009) Hundreds? Not just.

Millions.

What are their names? Don’t ask. Where do they live? Don’t ask.

JUST MORE FALSE PROPAGANDA

There is zero evidentiary support support for this — false propaganda. And, just as in 1953: “The plotters had been active without pause. They controlled four-fifths of the press and put out false propaganda as well as anti-government articles, some of which were written by CIA experts.” (Homa Katouzian, Musaddiq and the struggle for power in Iran, I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd, 1990, p 188)

“HIGHLY IMAGINATIVE”

When you see an article with totally unbelievable information designed to take over the country of Iran, you just know that those “CIA experts” were “highly imaginative”.

“Dalí was highly imaginative, and also had an affinity for partaking in unusual and grandiose behavior, in order to draw attention to himself.” (Salvador Dalí, Wikipedia)

Like Mousavi, Dalí had “Islamic roots”, that is, “a self-styled “Arab lineage,” claiming that his ancestors were descended from the Moors.” (id.) “Self-styled”? That means “highly imaginative”.

And how does the less imaginative reality look? We recall that when Jews in Persia pretended to become Muslims, many “of them, however, remained faithful to Judaism and lived a life of crypto-Jews, secret Jews, not unlike the Marranos in the Iberian Peninsula after their forced conversion to Christianity in 1492.” (Raphael Patai, Jadīd al-Islām, Wayne State University Press, 1997, p 16)

BUT HE INSISTS ITS TRUE

Born in 1904 in Catalonia, Dalí insisted on his “Arab lineage”, claiming that his ancestors were descended from the Moors who occupied Southern Spain for nearly 800 years (711-1492), and attributed to these origins, “my love of everything that is gilded and excessive, my passion for luxury and my love of oriental clothes.” (Ian Gibson, The Shameful Life of Salvador Dali, W. W. Norton & Company, 1997 sourced from Wikipedia)

Gibson found out that “Dalí” (and its many variants) is an extremely common surname in Arab countries like Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria or Egypt. On the other hand, also according to Gibson, Dalí’s mother’s family, the Domènech of Barcelona, had Jewish roots. (id.)

BUT MAYBE HE WAS A MARRANO, OR “SECRET” JEW?

Mousavi would like to recite Koran verses while working together with MI6 to organize streets riots. Pictured at left, we see one of his Jadīd al-Islām brethren burning a bus in Iran. Note the mask covering his substantial nose.

And the mask conceals his identity? No one has any idea who’s behind that mask?

Real Iranians have to reason to destroy the property of their nation.

WHEN “SECRET” IS NOT SECRET AT ALL

Destruction? Oh, the sort of thing wrought by the merchants of cosmetics, cigarettes, bras, sun-tanning products, and global financial crises.

But in Iran too? “The majority of the Jews of Persia are engaged in trade [cosmetics, cigarettes, bras, sun-tanning products, and global financial crises], in jewellery, in wine and opium manufacture, as musicians, dancers, scavengers, pedlars, and in other professions to which is attached no great respect.” (Raphael Patai, Jadīd al-Islām, Wayne State University Press, 1997, p 17) Or just burning buses.

A BIZARRE VISION

Which brings us right to the Hallucinogenic Toreador. Images of mutilated women. While some people call these “striking and bizarre images in his surrealist work” (Salvador Dalí, Wikipedia), these pictures have to say something about the mind that produced them.

Which reminds us immediately of the Antichrist film from Jewish director Lars von Trier. That’s the film where “Von Trier was suggesting with his film that “woman should be burnt at the stake”” The film had lots of mutiliation and shocking abuse. (’AntiChrist’ gets ‘anti-prize’ at Cannes, AFP, 23 May 2009)

With the breast cancer/bra business, a lot of mutilated images result — women with amputated breasts. Or all those people with mutilated lungs as a result of cigarette smoke. And the list goes on and on.

Which shows us why Dr. Patai was right yet again: “The discussion so far should have made it clear that, whatever the Law of Return or halakhic law says, to be Jewish is primarily a matter of feeling, of emotional commitment.” (Raphael Patai, The Jewish Mind, 1996, Wayne State University Press, p 23)

Emotional commitment to those core values. As shown in the great works of art of the Jew Salvador Dalí, and in the films of the great(est) Jewish director Lars von Trier, and, of course, in the riots and shootings coordinated by the Jewish agitator Mir Hossein Mousavi (together with, of course, his “millions” of supporters).

So let him recite his Koran verses all he likes.

No one should be fooled.

UPDATES EVERY 10 TO 15 DAYS

A STAR IS RISEN

“Bruno is Baron Cohen’s follow-up to Borat, his hugely popular piece of guerilla performance art cum gross-out comedy.” (Katrina Onstad, FILM REVIEW -Bruno – Sacha Baron Cohen’s latest film is hilarious, unbearable and troubling — sometimes all at once, CBC News, 11 Jul 2009)

“GROSS OUT” WORKS OF ART

“Gross out”? That means appalling. Which reminds us immediately of the Antichrist film from Jewish director Lars von Trier. That’s the film where “Von Trier was suggesting with his film that “woman should be burnt at the stake so that man can finally stand up.”" (‘AntiChrist’ gets ‘anti-prize’ at Cannes, AFP, 23 May 2009) Plenty of mutilation and “shocking” abuse.

Of course, Mr. Cohen is, just like Lars von Trier, “an observant, Hebrew-speaking Jew with close ties to Israel”. (Aron Heller, Bruno has a gay ole time in the Holy Land, AP, 17 Jul 2009)

In Mr. Trier’s film, there was “graphically-portrayed sexual mutilation.” (Mike Collett-White, Lars von Trier film “Antichrist” shocks Cannes, Reuters, 17 May 2009)

JEWISH WORKS OF ART GREETED WITH DISDAIN

In Mr. Cohen’s film, there are, of course, also victims: “Bruno’s flamboyant sashay across the Middle East has succeeded in one thing — uniting Sacha Baron Cohen’s unwitting Israeli and Palestinian victims in their joint disdain for his latest comedic creation.” (Heller, supra)

“Danish director Lars von Trier elicited derisive laughter, gasps of disbelief, a smattering of applause and loud boos on Sunday as the credits rolled on his drama “Antichrist” at the Cannes film festival.” (Mike Collett-White, supra)

BY BOTH JEWS AND CHRISTIANS

This disdain cannot be thought of as anti-Semitic, because Jews are also appalled by these artists: “he nearly sparks a riot in an ultra-Orthodox Jewish neighborhood in Jerusalem when he struts down the street in a sexed-up Hassidic outfit that includes skintight shorts.” (Heller, supra)

And why is it that this “disdain” seems to attach to the works of Jewish artists?

OFFICIAL ORTHODOX JEWISH POSITION

Probably because these works are offensive:

“Jonathan Rosenblum, an ultra-Orthodox columnist, said he hasn’t viewed the scene but said the reaction was to be expected.

“It was offensive. It was meant to be offensive and it succeeded”" (Heller, supra)

Not surprisingly, Henry Ford agrees with this correct sentiment:

“Not only the “legitimate” stage, so-called, but the motion picture industry – the fifth greatest of all industries – is also entirely Jew-controlled; with the natural sequence that the civilized world is increasingly antagonistic to the trivializing and demoralizing influence of that form of entertainment as at present managed.

As soon as the Jew gained control of American liquor, we had a liquor problem with drastic consequences. As soon as the Jew gained control of the “movies” we had a movie problem, the consequences of which are visible.” (Henry Ford, The International Jew, 1920)

So, what was so offensive about all this?

LIES

“”This man, I think he is not a man,” said Ayman Abu Aita, a former member of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades, a militant group that has been largely disbanded. “He is not saying the truth about me. He lied.“” (Heller, supra)

And where have we seen that sort of thing just lately? Right in the country where “The plotters had been active without pause. They controlled four-fifths of the press and put out false propaganda as well as anti-government articles, some of which were written by CIA experts.” (Homa Katouzian, Musaddiq and the struggle for power in Iran, I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd, 1990, p 188)

OFFENSIVE ART WORK ATTRACTS DISDAIN

“False propaganda”? That means lies. The con artists putting out this material find that their professional work is increasingly greeted with disdain. Because “It was offensive. It was meant to be offensive and it succeeded”" (as per Heller, supra)

“Mousavi appears driven to maintain his opposition and even to raise the stakes.” “”A majority of the people — including me — do not accept its political legitimacy,” he said of the regime, adding: “There’s a danger ahead.”" (Jim Heintz, Iran reports more protest arrests, AP, 2 Jul 2009) And this just after an election which the Iranian government won.

FALSE PROPAGANDA

While it may be true that Mr. Mousavi doesn’t accept the results, he provides ZERO factual support for his contention that a “majority of the people” do not. He’s engaged in fabrication, or, as Ayman Abu Aita would say it: “He is not saying the truth … He lied.“” (Heller, supra)

So how can this bluffer possibly get star billing — the status where everything he wants published gets uncritically promoted by the worldwide, Jewish press? “The Theater is swamped in numerous “stars” that never really rose and certainly never shone, but which were hoisted high on the advertising walls of the Jewish theatrical syndicates in order to give the public the impression that these feeble lanternlights were in the highest heaven of dramatic achievement. The trick is a department store trick. It is sheer advertising strategy. Whereas in normal times a discriminating public made the “star” by their acclaim, nowadays the Jewish managers determine by their advertisements who the star shall be.” (Ford, supra)

Like some advertising in a Time Magazine cover story!! But just check the full spectrum of Jewish publications for the mass goy market. They all hoist high this start who “never really rose and certainly never shone“.

THREE EXAMPLES

We’ve studied three Jewish actors here. All of them produce work which is generally disdained by decent people. Because “It was offensive. It was meant to be offensive and it succeeded”" (as per Heller, supra)

But all of these “stars” receives heavy promotion. Consider this recommendation from the Jewish outlet NRK:

“«Antichrist» tar oss med på en intens og høyst ukomfortabel reise inn i galskapen, en reise som kanskje også innebærer en eksorsisme av regissørens egne demoner.” (Anne Hof, – Ikke la deg skremme!, 6 Jun 2009)

The title says a lot: Don’t let yourself be scared. Instead, let this talented Jewish director guide you on an intense and extremely uncomfortable trip in to insanity, a trip which can also lead to an exorcism of the demons dwelling within the director.

In previous lessons, we’ve often discussed demons and the work of the devil (see here and here). Just religious fanaticism? Not according to NRK. The Jew Lars von Trier is possessed of demons, according to this prestigious Jewish organ.

“Og slett ikke det verste som har vært vist på norske kinoer.” (Hof, supra) But let’s say you don’t want to make a trip into the depths of insanity, and really don’t care to see the demons at work. There’s still a reason to visit the film. According to NRK, its not the worst that has been shown in Norwegian cinemas.

“Thus we reach the conclusion that a Jew is a person who considers himself a Jew and is so considered by others. Which, of course, does not change the fact that to be Jewish is a state of mind, except that now we have recognized that the state, or position, of more than one mind is involved: that of the individual whose Jewishness is being adjudged, and that of his social environment.” (Raphael Patai, The Jewish Mind, 1996, Wayne State University Press, p 24)

State of mind? “galskapen, en reise som kanskje også innebærer en eksorsisme av regissørens egne demoner” (Hof, supra) Insanity, mingled with demonic possession. According to NRK.

And what is Mr. Mousavi’s “social environment”? Oh, just the usual. A pack of MI6 and CIA types, together with the Jewish journalists of the world.

And they’ve given him that uncritical “thumbs up” reserved for other Jewish actors/directors like Mr. Cohen and Mr. Trier.

And can thousands of Jewish journalists be wrong when they recognize their countryman?

“Thus, in the course of a few weeks it was possible to conjure up names out of the void, to associate them with incredible hopes on the part of the broad public, even to give them a popularity which the really great man often does not obtain his whole life long; names which a month before no one had even seen or heard of, while at the same time old and proved figures of political or other public life, though in the best of health, simply died as far as their fellow men were concemed, or were heaped with such vile insults that their names soon threatened to become the symbol of some definite act of infamy or villainy. We must study this vile Jewish technique of emptying garbage pails full of the vilest slanders and defamations from hundreds and hundreds of sources at once, suddenly and as if by magic, on the clean garments of honorable men, if we are fully to appreciate the entire menace represented by these scoundrels of the press.

There is absolutely nothing one of these spiritual robber barons will not do to achieve his savory aims.” (Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf)

ALL-OUT EFFORT TO TAKE OVER THE COUNTRY

After all, “the plotters were ready to go to any lengths, including a full-scale civil war.” (Katouzian, supra, p 190)

NO TACTIC TOO DIRTY FOR THESE PEOPLE

Any lengths? “”It’s in the United States’ national interest to make sure that we have employed all elements at our disposal, including diplomacy, to prevent Iran from achieving that nuclear capacity,” Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”” (William Kole, Iran: No downgrade of diplomatic ties with Britain, AP, 29 Jun 2009) All elements? Oh, how about false propaganda, lies, and the murder of Neda Soltan. Etc., etc.

As the Jewish secretary of state in America, Hillary Clinton put it: “We also have made it clear that we’ll take actions — as I’ve said time and time again, crippling action”. (Hillary Clinton, cited in Robert Burns, Clinton declares the US ‘is back’ in Asia, AP, 22 Jul 2009) And this time, this Jew is telling the truth. As we see in the matter of Neda Soltan, who has been crippled — for life.

A huge loss for Neda Soltan and her family, but for the American special forces snipers? Its just another day on the front lines of the war against terror.

So whether its taking down innocent women on the streets, or taking over an oil-rich country, or just corrupting the morals of the world, these “plotters were ready to go to any lengths” (as per Katouzian, supra, p 190) But I guess that’s just how they try to exorcise their demons. (as per Hof, supra)

UPDATES EVERY 10-15 DAYS

ENGLISH/AMERICAN TAKEOVER JOB

In our last lesson, we studied the parallels between the 2009 English/American destabilization efforts in Iran to their successful 1953 takeover. The same tactics were used in both efforts, which were coordinated in both cases out of the English embassy.

In 1953, the English and Americans hired criminals like Sha’ban the Brainless to engage in acts of violence and crimes against the state.

Since the same playbook is being used in 2009, its important to find out just who is played Sha’ban this time around. Or, say, General Zahedi.

TRAITORS FROM WITHIN

According to an impeccable Jewish source, “Mohammad Fazlollah Zahedi (1897 – 2 September [or 1 September] 1963) was an Iranian general who named himself Prime Minister in 1953 after helping the United States and Britain overthrow Iran’s elected government.” (Fazlollah Zahedi, Wikipedia) He’s shown in his lovely uniform at right.

GENERAL ZAHEDI 2009

“A top aide to Iran’s supreme leader called the country’s main opposition figure a U.S. agent and accused him in an editorial Saturday of committing crimes against the nation. While hard-line figures had previously demanded Mir Hossein Mousavi to be prosecuted for describing Iran’s June 12 elections fraudulent and leading demonstrations afterward, the editorial was the first public declaration that the opposition leader was a foreign agent.” (Ali Dareini, Iranian hardliner calls opposition leader US agent, AP, 4 Jul 2009)

WHERE YOU GET REAL NEWS FIRST

The AP journalist is almost right. Certainly the opposition activist Mr. Mousavi is a foreign agent, but the Kayhan exposé was NOT “THE FIRST PUBLIC DECLARATION”! No, that was the story that this website brought on 29 May 2009!! So if you want the hot, breaking news, days and weeks before those “mainstream” types get it, you come straight to JESUSLORDOFALL, and get the hard news — often in advance!!

Having established that Mr. Mousavi is a foreign agent, we just need to find out “what kind”.

RELIANCE ON TOP AUTHORITY

Naturally, we rely on expert authorities — like Dr. Raphael Patai. “After studying at the University of Breslau Rabbinical Seminary and receiving a doctorate and a rabbinical diploma from the University of Budapest, he followed his own Zionist impulses and studied at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, where he received the university’s first doctorate, in 1936.” (Robert Thomas, Raphael Patai, 85, a Scholar of Jewish and Arab Cultures, New York Times, 25 Jul 1996)

“Before embarking on our voyage into the Jewish mind we must … come to a clear understanding of who is a Jew.” (Raphael Patai, The Jewish Mind, 1996, Wayne State University Press, p 15)

Usually, this analysis is very simple. For example, the Jewish governor of Alaska, who also tried to become the American vice president, “delivered bagels to lawmakers”. (Mark Thiessen, Alaska observers say Palin had gone fishin’ on job, AP, 6 Jul 2009)

When we studied the narco-state in Afghanistan, there was no great question about the governor there, Mr. Karzai. We just viewed a side photo, and the nose gave him away. Combine that with an active involvement in the drug business, and a certain love of corruption, and the case is proven.

BY CONVERSION OR BIRTH

In this study, this is no need to research the obscure origins of Mr. Mousavi’s bloodlines:

“The very fact that this question can arise indicates to what extent the Halakha, the traditional Jewish religious law, has lost its hold over the Jewish mind. Prior to the Jewish Enlightenment, when all Jews (with a very few exceptions) observed and obeyed the Halakha, its definition of a Jews was accepted as axiomatic. Halakhically, a Jew is an individual who was either born to a Jewish mother, or converted to Judaism.” (Patai, id.)

DOES MOUSAVI’S STATE OF MIND CONFIRM THAT HE IS JEWISH?

No, instead we just need to examine the objective, public-record evidence of his commitments: “The discussion so far should have made it clear that, whatever the Law of Return or halakhic law says, to be Jewish is primarily a matter of feeling, of emotional commitment.” (Patai, supra, p 23)

Mr. Mousavi was an “accomplice in riots” (Fars news agency cited in Iran daily calls for Mousavi to be tried for treason, AFP, 4 Jul 2009) Mr. Mousavi was talking a lot about “reforms”, while at the same time working with the MI6 agents from the British Embassy to burn Iranian property.

STREET TERRORISM AND THE 1863 GENERAL UPRISING

In 1861, the Jews started another revolution in Poland. (Henri Troyat, Zar Alexander II., Societaets-Verlag, 1990, p. 80) A Jew, Jaroschinski, who was a tailor, tried to shoot the Russian governor in Poland, Grand Prince Konstantin.

Another Jew put a bullet through the jaw of the tsar’s representative Lueders. (id., p. 84)

The Jew Jaroschinski and several other terrorists were executed. (id., p. 85) The Jewish people was irritated by these developments. So the Jews launched a general uprising in January 1863. (id., p. 85) Needless to say, the Jewish press in France took the part of the rebels. They called the Russians bloodthirsty barbarians. (id., p. 88)

FAST FORWARD TO 2009

Barbarians: “ferocious Iranian government backlash against the protesters”. (Julian Borger and Ewen MacAskill, Barack Obama condemns ‘unjust’ crackdown on Iran protests, Guardian, 23 Jun 2009)

VERSION 1: SHOT BY SNIPER

But wasn’t there actually a shooting? “Obama spoke of the “searing image” of the dying moments of Neda ­Soltan, a young female protester shot by a sniper and now an icon of the revolt.” (id.)

VERSION 2: SHOT BY MILITIA ON MOTORCYCLE WITH TWO RIDERS

But was she really shot by a sniper? “Reports of how she was killed vary — from a rooftop sniper’s bullet to a passing shot by two Basij militiamen on a motorcycle” (Neda Soltan, Young Woman Hailed as Martyr in Iran, Becomes Face of Protests, FOX, 22 Jun 2009)

VERSION 3: SHOT BY ONE MILITIA MAN

“A crowd of demonstrators had caught the basij — an Islamic volunteer militaman — who shot her from his motorbike. He was a big, strong man in his forties, clean-shaven except for a moustache.

“I heard him shouting, ‘I didn’t want to kill her. I didn’t want to kill her. I meant to shoot her in the leg’.” The crowd were furious. Some were trying to lynch him. Others were saying: “We’re not killers. Don’t harm him.”

All agreed that there was no point in handing the man to the police so they simply took his identify card and let him go.” (Martin Fletcher, Doctor tells how Neda Soltan was shot dead by Ahmadinejad’s basij, The Times, 26 Jun 2009)

SO WHAT DOES ALL THIS TELL US?

When riots are going on, police never go out alone. They’re always in groups. (as shown at left)

So the story that this boy was out alone, and was a real policeman, is a lie.

And then the story that the crowd caught a “big, strong man”. With a gun.

This doesn’t happen either. Police anywhere in the world have authority to open fire when their lives are threatened.

But the clincher? “they simply took his identify card” (Fletcher, supra) And this is what makes it so hard for the English Embassy. If their agents took the ID card, why aren’t there any pictures of it?

Of course, we also note that the chances for a single heart shot from a moving motorcycle are virtually nonexistent. This was a one-bullet job. While a shooter on a moving motorcycle could spray the crowd with fire, that isn’t what happened here at all.

SO THE STORY ABOUT THE “BASIJ” SHOOTING NEDA SOLTAN FROM THE MOTORCYCLE IS A TOTAL LIE.

WHEN ENGLAND MOBILIZES FOR ACTION

Which brings us right back to 1953: “The intelligence staff at the British embassy in Tehran were reinforced, and their domestic contacts mobilized for action against the government.” (Homa Katouzian, Musaddiq and the struggle for power in Iran, I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd, 1990, p 177)

Since the foreign (Jewish) press is circulating a demonstrably false story about how Neda Soltan was shot, we just need to ask who might have been “mobilized”. Who was there with a camera to photograph Neda Soltan as she died, but just forgot to take pictures of that big, strong policeman? Or, for that matter, of that identity card.

Exactly the same people who urged Mousavi/General Zahedi into action: “Middleton, the British chargé d`affaires in Teheran, had begun to prompt Major-General Zahedi into action early in 1952. C. M. Woodhouse (of Britain’s MI6) was running the operation to overthrow the government (code-named Operation Ajax). The American embassy in Tehran took direct control of these activities in October 1952, when the Iranian government closed down the British embassy precisely in the hope of curtailing British plotting. Britain’s efforts have now been so well-documented in books, memoirs, documentary programmes, etc., that it is unnecessary to reproduce the details in the present volume.” (Katouzian, supra, p 178)

We have the minor difference that in 2009, the American embassy in Tehran is closed, and all the activities are being run out of the British embassy, but other than that, the playbook is the same:

FALSE PROPAGANDA IN THE PRESS

“The plotters had been active without pause. They controlled four-fifths of the press and put out false propaganda as well as anti-government articles, some of which were written by CIA experts.” (Katouzian, supra, p 188)

Wow. Those CIA “experts” messed up again. They couldn’t get their story straight on the murder of Neda Soltan. Too bad they had to make that false claim about the policeman’s ID card. Really too bad.

THOSE SHOOTERS — AGAIN

So who would shoot down Neda Soltan in cold blood? How about the same people who went after Grand Prince Konstantin and Lueders.

“Dead babies, mothers weeping on their children’s graves, a gun aimed at a child and bombed-out mosques – these are a few examples of the images Israel Defense Forces soldiers design these days to print on shirts they order to mark the end of training, or of field duty. The slogans accompanying the drawings are not exactly anemic either: A T-shirt for infantry snipers bears the inscription “Better use Durex,” next to a picture of a dead Palestinian baby, with his weeping mother and a teddy bear beside him. A sharpshooter’s T-shirt from the Givati Brigade’s Shaked battalion shows a pregnant Palestinian woman with a bull’s-eye superimposed on her belly, with the slogan, in English, “1 shot, 2 kills.” A “graduation” shirt for those who have completed another snipers course depicts a Palestinian baby, who grows into a combative boy and then an armed adult, with the inscription, “No matter how it begins, we’ll put an end to it.”" (Mary Rizzo, Israeli Army’s Heart of Darkness, Palestine Think Tank, 20 Mar 2009)

THE FOREIGN AGENT — AMERICA’S TOP REPRESENTATIVE IN THE COUNTRY

Which brings us back to the “foreign agent” Mousavi, who has been “murdering innocent people, holding riots, cooperating with foreigners and acting as America’s fifth column inside the country.” (Hossein Shariatmadari, cited in Dareini, supra)

Or, to put it another way, the sort of man like General Zahedi, who “was in contact with both military and civilian leaders of the coup from his hideout in an American ‘safe house’ in Tehran.”(Katouzian, supra, p 191)

There is a military component — holding riots and murdering innocent people. And, since the same old playbook is being used, we just need to ask, Who is playing General Zahedi this time around? Of course, its Mir Hossein Mousavi.

“The discussion so far should have made it clear that, whatever the Law of Return or halakhic law says, to be Jewish is primarily a matter of feeling, of emotional commitment.” (Patai, supra, p 23)

Is Mr. Mousavi committed to the Iranian people, as he and his MI6 handlers try to burn down the town?

Certainly, based on this brief but adequate study of Mr. Mousavi’s actions, we have to say that he has ZERO “emotional commitment” to the people of Iran.

So, what non-Iranian people might Mr. Mousavi just happen to be loyal to?

SAME PLAYS — SAME TYPE OF PLAYERS

This is just a replay of the 711 takeover of the Visigoth Kingdom in Spain. The fifth column (Hossein Shariatmadari, cited in Dareini, supra) has been in place for years. And once again, the English embassy is coordinating a takeover of Iran. With the help of a traitor inside the country. “General Zahedi”.

“Mohammad Fazlollah Zahedi (1897 – 2 September [or 1 September] 1963) was an Iranian general who named himself Prime Minister in 1953 after helping the United States and Britain overthrow Iran’s elected government.” (Fazlollah Zahedi, Wikipedia)

In Iran, in 2009, there were elections. And the result? A popular government was elected. Just not the one that England wanted.

And so they are working with their man on the inside. Plenty of lying atrocity propaganda, as usual (and as shown above).

“Nevertheless, the suspicious activities in Tehran of foreign agents during the past two weeks together with their internal counterparts [Mir Hossein Mousavi] show that a secret organization is … working against Dr Musaddiq’s government, and the American and British imperialists have not yet lost faith in the use of their last card.” (Katouzian, supra, 189)

We’ve studied lots and lots of history in the pages of this website. The parallels between the 1953 takeover and the efforts of 2009 are so obvious. “Thus history has supplied a profound justification for the taxonomical dichotomy of mankind into Jews and Gentiles“. (Patai, supra, p 4)

There is a certain group of people who just love to get revolutions going. Sweep out those “tyrants” and replace them with “reformist” leadership.

REFORMS

The sort of people who will bring in gay marriage, legalize pornography, and arrange for “easy credit”.

Since “not all Jews were the descendants of Abraham, that conversions to Judaism have occurred at all times, and that non-Jewish blood has entered the Jewish aggregate in numerous other ways as well.” (Patai, supra, p 19), its not a matter exclusively of blood.

No, its a matter of values: “Albert Einstein, a German Jew, not only influenced more than any other scientist the development of both the warlike and the peaceful utilization of atomic power“. (Patai, supra, p 14) You see a war going down. Or, say, a takedown of a democratically-elected government like the one in Iran, and you can just know that its Jewish values at work.

But isn’t there some requirement of Passover observance and synagogue membership? Not at all: “There are many individuals who will answer “Yes” to the question “Are you a Jew?” and who not only belong to no Jewish congregation or organization, but observe nothing of Jewish religion. Even if an individual born to Jewish parents takes the step of formally converting to another religion, he does not thereby automatically cease being Jewish.” (Patai, supra, p 16)

We’ve given the most careful study to conversos masquerading as Christians in Spain, and the colonies. But what about Iran? Could there be conversos operating there as well?

Of course there are: “the forced conversion of Jews to Islam in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Persia resulted in seperate “New Muslim” communities.” (id.)

As usual, these “New Muslims”, like Mr. Mousavi, will protest that they are loyal to the Iranian Nation and are not working to overthrow the country.

But this sort of thing was going on back in 694, when the Visigoth Kingdom had to bring in severe laws because Jews were conspiring with external powers to overthrow the kingdom. (Roger Collins, Early Medieval Spain, MacMillan Press, 1983, p. 135-136) Naturally, the Jews denied this. The pretension was that they were loyal citizens.

In 711, when they led Arab armies to complete the takeover of Spain, everyone knew that was a lie.

The proofs are complete. There is an unquestionable loyalty to those core traditional values. “Thus history has supplied a profound justification for the taxonomical dichotomy of mankind into Jews and Gentiles”. (Patai, supra, p 4)

“Which of the prophets have not your fathers persecuted? and they have slain them which shewed before of the coming of the Just One; of whom ye have been now the betrayers and murderers: ” (Saint Stephen, Acts 7:52, Holy Bible)

1. “A method of operating or functioning.
2. A person’s manner of working.” (modus operandi, answers.com)

So rest in peace, Neda Soltan.

There’s been some violence lately, and the Jewish president is outraged! “President Barack Obama said the world was “appalled and outraged” at Tehran’s use of violence”. (Iran’s crackdown dampens opposition, AP, 23 Jun 2009)

It usually doesn’t happen this way. Back on 5 May 2009, the U.S. special forces liquidated more than 150 “children, women, and elderly men“. And “the world” got all appalled and outraged? If it did, we didn’t hear about it from Mr. Obama.

But then again, there were no MI6 agents among the Afghan dead.

SHOCKING WAVE OF CIA-SPONSORED VIOLENCE

“Iran’s English-language Press TV said seven people were killed and several wounded at the end of Monday’s rally — a mainly peaceful gathering attended by many tens of thousands — when “thugs” tried to attack a military post in central Tehran.

An Iranian photographer at the scene had said Islamic militiamen opened fire when people in the crowd attacked a post of the Basij religious militia. He said one person was killed and many wounded in the shooting.” (Iran rules out annulment, Tehran crowds gather, indianexpress.com, 16 Jun 2009)

“People in the crowd” attacking a police station? Those were the MI6 and CIA agents (pictured at left).

But would American and England really stoop that low? “”It’s in the United States’ national interest to make sure that we have employed all elements at our disposal, including diplomacy, to prevent Iran from achieving that nuclear capacity,” Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”" (William Kole, Iran: No downgrade of diplomatic ties with Britain, AP, 29 Jun 2009)

All elements? Thugs, riots, bribes? You read the quote. ALL elements.

And the CIA has really done that sort of thing? Read on.

But these agents fell in the line of duty, so they will at least get an honorable mention in the HQ at Vauxhall Cross. Sure the Indian press refers to these apostles of democracy as “thugs”, but in the corridors of power in London they will receive as much as a minute of respectful silence before the boys more on to their next move against Iran.

OBAMA: THE POLICE AND MILITARY SHOULD STAND DOWN

President Obama’s idea is that when CIA and MI6 agents burn Iranian police cars, the police shouldn’t shoot. Oh, no, they should have a kissing party!

LIKE THEY DID THE LAST TIME

Like the one back in 1953.

“Between 4 and 5 pm Musaddiq’s house was completely encircled. General Riyahi, the chief of staff, had already been arrested in his office. A few hours earlier he had ordered his own deputy, General Kiyani, to lead an army group consisting of an infantry and a tank battalion into the city from lshrat-Abad Barracks which was then on the outskirts of Tehran. The effective deployment of this force could have sealed the fate of the coup. Kiyani ‘was a good man, but he was not up to the task’, as witnessed by Colonel Mumtaz many years afterwards. Here General Daftary played his crucial role. Flanked by a number of rebel officers, he met Kiyani’s force on the outskirts of the city with open arms, begging them not to intervene; there followed a ‘kissing party’, and the entire force was won over.” (Homa Katouzian, Musaddiq and the struggle for power in Iran, I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd, 1990, p 192)

CIA REPLACES DEMOCRATICALLY-ELECTED GOVERNMENT WITH TYRANNY

Musaddiq was the democratically elected president in Iran. His political view centered on nationalization of the oil fields with the idea that the profits should benefit the people of Iran rather than the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. He had an army, and police. But there were some riots going on: “Undoubtedly, there would have been no coup in August 1953 if it had not been for the CIA. The CIA devised Operation Ajax, paid a large sum to carry it out – estimates of the final cost range from $100,000 to $20 million, depending on which expenses are counted – and assigned one of its most imaginative agents to direct it.” (Stephen Kinzer, All the Shah’s Men, Wiley, 2007, p 210) And instead of having the police and army defend the state, there was a “kissing party”, and Iranian independance came to an end.

AND NOW THEY WANT TO DO IT AGAIN

And now the same game is going down. How do we know? The top dog in Iran says so: “”The most treacherous government is Britain,” Ayatullah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, intoned at Friday prayers on June 19″. (Joe Klein, Can the U.S. Deal With a Divided Iran?, TIME, 25 Jun 2009)

FOREIGN OFFICE DUPLICITY

Homa Katouzian’s Chapter 13 is entitled “The ways and means of overthrowing Musaddiq“: “The title of this chapter has been extracted from the minutes written by Robin Zaehner for the Foreign Office of his conversation with Abbas Iskandari, in the summer of 1951, which make it clear that at the same time as the British government was taking its case to the Security Council, it was planning Musaddiq’s downfall by secret intervention in Iranian politics.” (Katouzian, supra, p 177)

And what do we see going on today. England and America have been taking their “case to the Security Council”. They think Iran may be “dangerous”, and has dark nuclear ambitions. No proof, mind you. But plenty of innuendo.

IT’S ALL SO SECRET. SURE.

And at the same time as these villains are working the “negotiations” angle, they are trying pull a “secret intervention”.

So — how secret is it?

GET THE POLICE OUT OF THE WAY, AND KILL THE PRESIDENT

Back on 28 February 1953, Musaddiq had been visiting the Shah in his palace. “As he approached the main palace gates, however, he was astonished to hear loud denunciations of himself outside the gates. By quick thinking and a stroke of luck he managed to leave through another gate which was unlocked on his own initiative by a palace official. The crowd then gave chase to his car, but were prevented by a police cordon from moving towards his home. At this point, Prince Hamid Reza, the shah’s youngest brother, intervened and ordered the police to give way. The mob then attacked Musaddiq’s house, and that of his son Ahmad next door. The house had an iron gate, and the well-known mobster, Sha’ban the Brainless, (with a retired army colonel sitting next to him) drove an army vehicle against it. “ (Katouzian, supra, p 182)

And who paid for these mobsters? “CIA money was being regularly used to swell Tudeh meetings with large numbers of hired mobsters“. (Katouzian, supra, p 185)

And the strategy? Kill Musaddiq. Get the police and military out of the way. And then send in hard-core thugs. Like Sha’ban the Brainless, or, say, the thugs who attacked the Iranian police station in 2009.

And this is what happens when England and America need to grab a country’s wealth: “Shortly afterwards Eden turned down the American solution for a settlement (which Musaddiq had accepted), told the US Secretary of State that there were better Iranian alternatives both to Musaddiq and to the Tudeh party, and advised him to ‘send [Musaddiq] home’.

ENGLAND IS DETERMINED NOT TO HAVE ANY NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT

Eden was determined not to come to any settlement with Musaddiq (see chapter 11). The intelligence staff at the British embassy in Tehran were reinforced, and their domestic contacts mobilized for action against the government. An important Foreign Office strategy was to frighten the US government into the belief that Musaddiq would deliver Iran into the hands of the Soviet Union. The CIA co-operated in thus misleading their own government into taking hostile action against Musaddiq.” (Katouzian, supra, p 177)

THUGS SWING INTO ACTION

And that’s how it is this time around. The intelligence staff at the British Embassy in Tehran has been reinforced. Their domestic contacts have been mobilized for action against the government. And the CIA is busy misleading people.

But have they fooled everyone? Not Ayatullah Ali Khamenei. And not even the people of Iran: “Iran also expelled two diplomats from Britain — a nation it bitterly accuses of meddling and spying“. (Iran’s crackdown dampens opposition, AP, 23 Jun 2009) Those were the coordinators. But needless to say, they had some “local”, dark-skinned talent: “Britain denounced the detention of nine local employees of its embassy in Tehran” (William Kole, Iran: No downgrade of diplomatic ties with Britain, AP, 29 Jun 2009)

And why should Iran be bitter about English meddling and spying? Because its always been this way!

THEFT AT GUNPOINT

“The Iranians pointed out that Britain had obtained the 1933 Agreement from an arbitrary ruler by the threat of force, or – as most of them believed – by issuing an order to him as its local agent; that it had been worse than the previous concession and had in fact led to a net financial loss to Iran ever since; that the company had ignored constant Iranian demands to see its general accounts, and to be told of the terms and quantity of its sales to the Royal Navy on special terms. They charged the company, on some objective evidence, with literally stealing crude oil via secret underwater pipelines connected to Iraq. They mentioned the company’s effectively autonomous rule in a part of the country, its treatment of the inhabitants as second-class citizens in their own land, its discrimination between expatriate and domestic workers and staff, and its particularly low wage rates. They showed that they were being paid in royalties up to 10 or 12 per cent of the company’s net proceeds, while the amount the company paid to the British government in taxes alone could be as high as 30 percent.” (Katouzian, supra, p 139)

Yes, England has been lying to, cheating, and stealing from the Iranian people for years and years.

ITS NO MYSTERY

“About 100 hard-line students protested outside the British Embassy in Tehran, where they burned U.S., British and Israeli flags, pelted the building with tomatoes, and chanted: “Down with Britain!” and “Down with USA!” state TV reported.” (Iran’s crackdown dampens opposition, AP, 23 Jun 2009)

The Jewish agitator and “Iranian” politician Mir Hossein Mousavi has tried denying this: “Mousavi also defended himself and his movement, identified by the color green, against the barrage of claims on state media about foreign hands behind the unrest. “The green movement is not dependent on foreigners,” he said.”" (Karin Laub, Iran reform leader says pressure to drop challenge, AP, 25 Jun 2009)

But not a soul believes him.

After all, the students know, the leader knows. “Iran has accused the West, particularly Britain and the United States, of inciting violence.” And the country is right! (Doctor flees Iran over “Neda” killing: report, Reuters, 26 Jun 2009) Even Sha’ban the Brainless could figure this one out!

SHA’BAN TYPES STILL ROAM THE WORLD

But these Sha’ban the Brainless types live on: “Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said Friday that “we are very worried over these events” and that “we have underlined the need that violence cease immediately.”

Frattini said G-8 officials deplored the violence and invited Iran to seek a peaceful solution. He stressed the group did not want to get into “electoral procedures” and interfere with Iran’s internal affairs.” (Karin Laub, Iranian cleric: harsh punishment for riot leaders, AP, 26 Jun 2009) If this Frattini the Brainless really wanted the violence to stop, he would talk to America and England. Those are the countries that buy the “leaders of the riots, who were supported by Israel and the U.S., strongly and with cruelty.” (Ayatollah Ahmed Khatami, cited in Laub, supra)

And as long as they know the truth, and don’t stand down in favor of a “kissing party”, the country will continue to prosper.

But the English and Americans will not give up so easily: “Roosevelt had in the meatime sent emissaries to the commanders of the provincial armies in Isfahan and Kirmanshah, encouraging them to move on Tehran. This, incidentally, shows that the plotters were ready to go to any lengths, including a full-scale civil war.” (Katouzian, supra, p 190) After all, its not their country.

It seems the English and Americans are having no problems finding brainless Iranian gangsters like Sha’ban the Brainless to work for them. Money is no problem, because the plotters were, and are, ready to go to any lengths to grab the country.

And the only safety for the Iranian people? Use all the tools they have, all they way, and things should be fine.

A JOB WELL DONE

Right now, it looks like this is happening: “club-wielding security forces dispersed a small group of protesters outside Iran’s parliament.” (Laub, supra) And when they are quick enough to do this everytime? “A security crackdown by Iran’s hardline government has largely driven demonstrators off Tehran’s streets this week.” (Doctor flees Iran over “Neda” killing: report, Reuters, 26 Jun 2009)

If the Iranians play their cards right, and learn from the lessons of 1953, this will turn into another Carridine situtation. So let the English talk tough. At the end of the day, they’ll be off to the hotel closet with those red fishnet stockings on for a little bit of “stretch”.

We’ve studied Wall Street figures like Bernard Madoff, film directors like Lars von Trier, and actors like David Carradine. Each, in his own way, has engaged in tremendous perversion. So you might be wondering, Where do these people come from? How did they get started on the downward path of perversion?

In this lesson, we study an emerging leader in the mold of these men.

PILLAR OF THE COMMUNITY

Mr. Tyler Weinman is a prominent member of the Florida Jewish community. He’s been raised on stories from the illustrious past of his people. Stories from the life of the great King David.

GREAT KING LEADS HIS PEOPLE IN WAR

David took over as Jewish king in about the year 1004 B.C. (Erhard Gorys, Das Heilige Land, Dumont, 1989). David got all the Jews together (about 975 B.C.) and went off to the city of Rabbah (today Amman, Jordan). There was some fighting, and David took the city.

A QUESTION OF ETHICS

First, David helped himself to the material goods. “And he took their king’s crown from off his head, the weight whereof was a talent of gold with the precious stones: and it was set on David’s head. And he brought forth the spoil of the city in great abundance.” 2 Samuel 12:30, Holy Bible)

TREMENDOUS PERVERSION

Like Mr. Madoff did. “One has to see what this guy has done as a tremendous perversion of doing justice,” said John R. Fishel, president of the Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles, which lost $6.4 million of its endowment. “This is a question of ethics.” (Duke Helfand, Madoff’s alleged misdeeds spark feelings of betrayal, outrage in L.A.’s Jewish community, Los Angeles Times, 24 Dec 2008 )

Then it was time for this great Jewish king to deal with the people of Rabbah. He gathered the prisoners together, and sawed them up, ran harrows over the bodies, and chopped them up with axes. Then off to the ovens!

“And he brought forth the people that were therein, and put them under saws, and under harrows of iron, and under axes of iron, and made them pass through the brick-kiln: and thus did he unto all the cities of the children of Ammon.” (2 Samuel 12:31, Holy Bible)

Plunder, torture, slice, dice, and then burn.

Just in one city? Oh, no. “thus did he unto all the cities of the children of Ammon.” (2 Samuel 12:31 (Holy Bible))

But surely Jews reserve punishments like these for their enemies in Ammon, and would never do anything like that to dumb animals?

MASS DESTRUCTION

“In the past month, residents in the Palmetto Bay and Cutler Bay neighborhoods have reported finding the bodies of more than two dozen cats, although police said some were likely killed by dogs. Some were missing fur — neighbors said some had been skinned — and appeared to have been cut with a sharp, straight instrument, police said.

MUTILATION

“What a horrible, horrific death for any animal,” said Nancy Mayes, whose cat, Sheba, was found dead this May. “We can only hope, I can only hope, that he killed her fast and instantly so that she didn’t endure the pain of the knife, the mutilation.”

“Tyler Hayes Weinman, whose divorced parents live in the neighborhoods where many of the cats were killed, was charged Sunday with 19 counts each of animal cruelty and improperly disposing of an animal body.” (Sarah Larimer, Florida teen charged in string of cat killings, AP, 15 Jun 2009)

MAYBE A FUTURE PRESIDENT

Hm. Cruelty. Where did we hear about that last? “Former president George W. Bush defended harsh interrogation tactics used in the “war on terror”". (Bush defends harsh interrogation tactics: report, AFP, 29 May 2009) Harsh? That means “Severe, cruel, or exacting”. (harsh, The Free Dictionary)

OR A GREAT FILM DIRECTOR

Jewish film director Lars von Trier thinks he’s the greatest film director in the world. Here, we studied his latest big film Antichrist. That was the film that had “scenes ranging from a talking fox to graphically-portrayed sexual mutilation.” Or, as Nancy Mayes put it “the pain of the knife, the mutilation“. (Larimer, supra) That’s the movie poster at right, replete with mutiliated body parts.

And what kind of mutilation was going on? “Louis B. Schlesinger, a professor of forensic psychology at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, said” “When you kill cats, disembowel them and cut their heads off, that is not a good sign and you do not have to be Sigmund Freud to see that”. (Larimer, supra)

So this young Jew disemboweled living creatures. Who would ever get an idea like that?

This sort of thing has happened before. And that in the year 117.

“Meanwhile the Jews in the region of Cyrene had put a certain Andreas at their head, and were destroying both the Romans and the Greeks. They would eat of their entrails, anoint themselves with their blood and wear their skins for clothing; many they sawed in two, from the head downwards; others they gave to wild beasts, and still others they forced to fight as gladiators. In all two hundred and twenty thousand persons perished. In Egypt, too, they perpetrated many similar outrages, and in Cyprus, under the leadership of a certain Artemion. There, also, two hundred and forty thousand perished, and for this reason no Jew may set foot on that island, but even if one of them is driven upon its shores by a storm he is put to death. Among others who subdued the Jews was Lusius, who was sent by Trajan.” (Dio Cassius, Epitome of Book LXVIII, Dio’s Roman History, Volume VIII, The Loeb Classical Library, 1925, pp 421, 423)

Let “the authorities” say what they want about Mr. Weinman. Obviously he’s paid attention in Hebrew class, carefully watched the films from the top Jewish directors, and who knows? Maybe one day he will be president of the United States!!

And if he can’t make it that far?

How about shift manager at “AgriProcessors—the world’s largest kosher slaughterhouse, which is located in Postville, Iowa”: “A new PETA undercover investigation has caught AgriProcessors—the world’s largest kosher slaughterhouse, which is located in Postville, Iowa—cruelly hacking holes in cows’ throats. Dr. Temple Grandin, the world’s foremost expert on slaughter methods, has stated that these gouging, circular cuts cause the cows pain and suffering.” http://www.youtube.com

WHEN KARMA CLOSES IN

This is Bill. He used to run the Deadly Viper Assassination Squad.

”There were Jewish bandits and gangsters who terrorized people; there were Jewish informers, looters, robbers, murderers; some even ”worked” as hired killers”. (Raphael Patai, The Jewish mind, Wayne State University Press, 1996, p 163)

IMPREGNATING WHITE WOMEN — BLENDED WITH SADISM AND MASOCHISM

Like other Jews, Bill had an active interest in white woman. Like the blond bride. She worked on his hit team. He got her pregnant. And then he shot her in the head, as thanks. Not, of course, for sadistic purposes, but rather for masochistic purposes. (Synopsis for Kill Bill: Vol. 1 (2003), IMDB) “They are notorious for the uncontrolled temper, which can flare up at the slightest provocation.” (Patai, supra, p 386)

Obviously this man knew the jargon of twisted sex.

Uma Thurman was a nice blond woman. Well-proportioned chest, good teeth — everything. But then she went to Hollywood, and now she gets to use dangerous cosmetics, get impregnated by a Jew, and then get shot in the head. (Synopsis for Kill Bill: Vol. 1 (2003), IMDB)

OH SUCH A MAN

So David Carridine was a big, tough, macho man?

In the films he was. Such moves. After all, he was the kung fu killer!

KUNG FU ADVERTISER

But like the other Hollywood tough guys, he had a message to deliver — smoke cigarettes. Pull out a cigarette, light up, and start puffing. The drug, nicotine, comes in, and the kung fu killer gets a feeling of pleasure.

”Tobacco smoking is a fairly recent habit, and over the years large numbers of Jews have taken it up.” (Arye Forta, Judaism, Heinemann, 1995, p 105)

“The nicotine in tobacco smoke travels quickly to the brain, where it acts as a stimulant and increases heart rate and breathing. Tobacco smoke also reduces the level of oxygen in the bloodstream, causing a drop in skin temperature. Inexperienced smokers are likely to experience dizziness, nausea and coughing or gagging.

DRUG ADDICT

The mood-altering effects of nicotine are subtle, complex and powerful. Some people feel that smoking helps them to be alert and to concentrate, and also that it helps them to feel relaxed. Research has shown that smoking raises levels of dopamine, a chemical in the brain, increasing feelings of pleasure and reinforcing the desire to continue to smoke.” (Do You Know… Tobacco, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health)

The pleasure comes quickly. “When a cigarette is smoked, the effects are felt in less than 10 seconds, and last only a few minutes.” (id.)

So, the mighty macho got his pleasures by sticking things in his mouth (see at right).

Were cigarettes the only pleasure sticks going in to that mouth? Apparently not.

A FLEXIBLE BODY WHEN YOUNG

Mr. Carradine was working in Thailand on a film called “Stretch”. (Actor David Carradine found dead in Bangkok, CBC, 4 Jun 2009) In his early years, he had kept his body supple with Kung Fu: “Carradine first became widely known for his role in Kung Fu as Kwai Chang Caine, a Shaolin monk who travels the American West in the 1800s, seeking out his half-brother. The series ran from 1972 to 1975. Armed only with martial arts skills” (id.)

Back in those days, he could stretch his back quite a bit, and got lots of pleasure out of doing so.

BODY GROWS OLD

But as the years passed by, Mr. Carradine became less flexible, and needed ropes to manage the stretch:

“A member of the emergency crew who was called to the hotel after a maid found Carradine told CNN that a yellow nylon rope was tied around the actor’s neck and a black rope was around his genitals. Police later confirmed that information.” (Alan Duke, Carradine’s body to return home, while questions remain, CNN, 5 Jun 2009)

So maybe he had some enemies? “Police said there was no sign of violence or forced entry into the actor’s room.” (‘Kung Fu’, ‘Kill Bill’ actor David Carradine dead in Bangkok hotel, TNA, 5 Jun 2009)

WORKING ALONE

So, not an enemy. Maybe it was a woman, engaged with Mr. Carridine in some “fun”? “Thai authorities said they have all but ruled out foul play, based on surveillance footage and interviews with hotel staff that indicate no one was in Carradine’s room before he died, said Col. Somprasong Yenthuam, who is heading the investigation.” (Anthony McCartney, Carradine family takes action on probe, photos, AP, 7 Jun 2009)

So what was going on with these ropes? There’s a certain distance between cock and mouth. If a kung fu artist is young and supple, he can handle the distance without help. But as he grows old, he needs some help in making the stretch.

GETTING IN TROUBLE BY ACTING STUPID

Mr. Carridine has been described as an alcoholic “American Jew”. He states that Jews “get into trouble” because they “act stupid”. (Annette Insdorf, Indelible shadows: film and the Holocaust, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp 43, 44)

And that’s exactly what happened to this man. In the films, he was oh so tough and macho. Women here and there. And all those cigarettes.

WHEN A KUNG FU KILLER GETS TOO OLD TO MAKE THE STRETCH

But at the end of the day, after all that acting, reality set in, as Mr. Carridine roped himself up for that stretch. On June 4, 2009, he was found dead. He just couldn’t make the stretch, and ran out of air trying.

SEVERE PERVERSION

As Jewish expert Perez Hilton puts it: “According to a review of the divorce court filings of ex-wife Marina Anderson, Carradine engaged in “abhorant [Sic] and deviant behavior which was potentially deadly” as well as an “incestuous relationship with a very close family member.”" (Perez Hilton, David Carradine’s Death Shrouded In Even More Mystery, perezhilton.com, 7 Jun 2009)

Pushing smoking in films, impregnating white women only to shoot them in the head, and dying while trying the great stretch. Its all so abhorrent — all so deviant — but all so typical of these people.

THE FARMER FEEDS HIS COWS

There are those cows of the field — brute beasts. They know which plants taste good, and which ones don’t, but are just not known for their higher reasoning abilities.

MILK THEM

Left on their own, they’d have no problem finding the right grasses to eat. But that doesn’t happen so much anymore now. Instead, they’re exploited — kept in feed lots where there is often not much fresh grass.

Well, a cow has got to eat, and so it does. Pretty much whatever the farmer gives.

But that’s the cow. People are different, aren’t they?

Much more reasoning power?

This gentlemen and his brethren don’t think so:

“If we have been able to bring them to such a pitch of stupid blindness is it not a proof, and an amazingly clear proof, of the degree to which the mind of the GOYIM is undeveloped in comparison with our mind? This it is, mainly, which guarantees our success. GENTILES ARE CATTLE” Protocol 15

These people have done well at exploiting their “cattle”. Whether we’re talking high finance and investments, or just that new-car loan, they’ve been squeezing out as much milk — and beef — as they can.

CARE AND FEEDING

So what is it that brings the gentiles “to such a pitch of stupid blindness“? We see the farmer in the first picture above. He’s the one who runs the cattle operation. Which is basically minimal medical care and such food as he sees fit. Just as the farmer in the second picture does.

What kind of feed is approved for the cattle kept by the second farmer?

Believe it or not, some sorts of feed are certified — with a golden palm.

Feed? Films. The sort of thing those cattle just love. Whether its a daily indulgence of television addiction, or a run to Blockbuster on the weekend for “something special”, the film industry is big business.

A lot of people make films in a lot of countries, so how can movie theater operators, TV executives, and other gatekeepers decide what to show?

THE STAMP OF APPROVAL

One certificate is called the golden palm. Its awarded at the Cannes Film Festival, which has just finished.

One of the top films this year was Antichrist, from Jewish director Lars von Trier:

“FUNNY”

“Danish director Lars von Trier elicited derisive laughter, gasps of disbelief, a smattering of applause and loud boos on Sunday as the credits rolled on his drama “Antichrist” at the Cannes film festival.” (Mike Collett-White, Lars von Trier film “Antichrist” shocks Cannes, Reuters, 17 May 2009)

Danish? “Lars von Trier was raised by nudist Jewish Communist parents who did not allow much room in their household for “feelings, religion, or enjoyment,”" (Lars von Trier, World Festival of Foreign Films) Ah, that kind of Danish.

At any rate, the audience at this exclusive festival was laughing about Mr. Trier’s film. What was so funny?

“Jeers and laughter broke out during scenes ranging from a talking fox to graphically-portrayed sexual mutilation.” (Collett-White, supra)

Hmm. Who might find these matters “funny”?

“At the end of the 1930s, shocked by the interference of the fascist governments of Germany and Italy in the selection of films for the Mostra de Venise, Jean Zay, the French Minister of National Education, decided to create an international cinematographic festival in France, on the proposal of Philippe Erlanger and the support of the British and Americans.” (Cannes Film Festival, Wikipedia)

That’s fascism for you — those forces of censorship interfere when great Jewish artists need to get some goy women sexually mulilated in their films.

Jean Zay was the Jewish Radical Socialist Minister of Education, who once wrote a poem calling the French tricolor “that stinking little rag” (TIME, June 22, 1936). (cited in PEOPLE IN WAR NEWS, Time, http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,711759-3,00.html) Philippe Erlanger was also Jewish. (Renee Poznanski, Jews in France During World War II, Google Books, 2001, p. 92)

We know how the Cannes Festival got started. We know who makes the films. But who was sitting in the audience? Who was laughing about the
“graphically-portrayed sexual mutilation”?

A JURY DECIDES WHICH FILMS GET THE AWARDS

That’s Isabella Huppert at the right. She was the president of the jury this year.

Ms. Huppert is, of course, Jewish. (http://www.quotesdaddy.com/quote/661320/isabelle-huppert/my-moms-a-catholic-and-my-dads-a-jew-and-they-didnt)

And that’s how it is at the Jewish film festival in France, where the Jewish jury picks the top Jewish-made films.

And the product of all this?

“Antichrist opens with a heavily stylized, black-and-white, slow-motion portrayal of the child’s accidental death set to soaring music by Handel.

Dafoe’s character, who is a therapist, tries to help his wife deal with her grief and encourages her to come off heavy medication that sedates her for weeks after the death.

They decide to go to an isolated wooden cabin in an unspecified forest to recover, but the woman Gainsbourg portrays loses control of her senses.

The abuse she submits herself and her husband to drew shocked gasps from the audience.” (Collett-White, supra)

Shocking tortures, and “soaring music” to celebrate the death of a child. What kind of minds come up with this stuff, and then laugh about it?

Sick minds.

Certainly the film title Antichrist is a very accurate description.

There’s a body of Christians who thought so: “Lars von Trier’s film was declared “the most misogynist movie from the self-proclaimed biggest director in the world” by an Ecumenical [not just Jews] Jury which every year hands out a prize to a Cannes film that celebrates spiritual values.” (‘AntiChrist’ gets ‘anti-prize’ at Cannes, AFP, 23 May 2009) Mr. Trier says he’s the greatest film director, but he made the most woman-hating film of the year.

“The jury president, the Romanian film-maker Radu Mihaileanu, said in a statement read out to AFP that Von Trier was suggesting with his film that “woman should be burnt at the stake so that man can finally stand up.”" (‘AntiChrist’ gets ‘anti-prize’ at Cannes, AFP, 23 May 2009)

But wait one minute. This film is just art, isn’t it? Perhaps a special expression of the Jewish mind, but shouldn’t there be some tolerance?

If it was “just” art, maybe. But no, its much more than that. In the past year, we’ve carefully studied the most woman-hating business practices possible: cosmetics and cancer, the Jewish bra business and breast cancer, the suntanning scam, the tobacco trade, and on and on.

Of course, its terrible to see “women being burnt at the stake”, but there’s something much worse here. “The abuse she submits herself and her husband to drew shocked gasps from the audience.” (Collett-White, supra)

Those cattle “submit themselves” to this abuse.

Which brings us back to the pictures at the start of this story. Two farmers feeding their cattle.

Those cows just eat away. Just like those people.

“If we have been able to bring them to such a pitch of stupid blindness is it not a proof, and an amazingly clear proof, of the degree to which the mind of the GOYIM is undeveloped in comparison with our mind? This it is, mainly, which guarantees our success. GENTILES ARE CATTLE” Protocol 15

And that’s how it is. Would you like some “soaring music by Handel” to accompany the tragic sufferings of those goy women? Sufferings and tortures to which they “submit themselves”. And which men like Lars von Trier are more than willing to dish out. With a smile!

UPDATES EVERY 10-15 DAYS

SETTING UP A NARCO STATE

Mr. Hamid Karzai is the Jewish governor of Afghanistan (as shown at left). Back in 2001, the American army conquered that nation. In the intervening 7 years, the American government has succeeded in turning the country into a narco state. “US Secretary of State-designate Hillary Clinton’s use of the term “narco state” to describe Afghanistan in a recent Senate testimony has caught the attention of her Afghan counterpart.” (Afghanistan protests Clinton’s description as ‘a narco state’, Gulfnews.com, 17 Jan 2009)

MASSIVE CORRUPTION

A narco state is a place where lots of drugs get produced, and drug money can buy anyone in the government.

Back in 2006, Ariana (Afghan) airline president Mohammed Atash stated, “We have been one of the most corrupt institutions in a very corrupt country.” (Eric Ellis, Making money in Afghanistan: Still risky business, FORTUNE Magazine, 5 Oct 2006)

Three years later, nothing has changed. Even the American president Mr. Obama has figured out that the puppet government in Afghanistan is riddled with corruption. (Obama tells Karzai to do more against corruption, Reuters, 6 May 2009)

Of course, things haven’t always been this way.

TALIBAN WAS CLEANING UP THE COUNTRY

There was a time when Afghans ran their own business, and actually outlawed opium production. That was back in 2000. Production fell drastically, but once the narco state was set up by the American government, production bounced right back. Right back up to 3400 metric tons of opium in 2002. (Taliban gone, opium returns, The Sun-Herald, 27 Oct 2002)

Since then, new records have been set. In fact, production has risen so sharply that the European heroin market has been flooded. “A glut of opium on the world market, fuelled by a record Afghan harvest, threatens a new heroin crisis in Britain, the European Union’s drug agency warned yesterday.” Yes, under American government, or, as they like to put, coalition government, the numbers are way up!

“The heroin warning from the European monitoring centre for drugs and drug abuse follows two record opium harvests in Afghanistan of 8,200 tonnes in 2007 and 7,700 tonnes this year.” (Alan Travis, Record opium harvest in Afghanistan threatens new heroin crisis in Britain, The Guardian, 7 Nov 2008)

TONNES AND TONS OF MISERY, BUT A HUGE STACK OF DOLLARS

There is so much opium out there. So many addicts. And all this misery brings in so much money! Where have we seen this before?

Jewish financier Bennett LeBow has lots of experience in the cigarette business. In 1986, he took over the Liggett Group. “LeBow admitted that nicotine is addictive and that smoking causes cancer“. “Even while he acknowledges the dangers of smoking, LeBow still makes a ton of money from the habit.” (Aixa M. Pascual, Lebow Turns Over a New Leaf, Business Week, May 7, 2001 )(emphasis added). A ton? $4 million a year for this work. http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?symbol=VGR

Liggett products include, for example, the cigarette brands Liggett Select, Eve, and Grand Prix. (www.liggettvectorbrands.com) The company website makes plain that using their products causes lung cancer, heart disease, and other problems. (id.)

WHEN MISERY CAME, IT WAS GIFT WRAPPED

The narco state came in with a bang. This special gift came from the people of the United States of America with the title “Operation Enduring Freedom”! Too cool.

So much freedom. Freedom to smoke cigarettes, drink sugar water, paint up those faces with cosmetics, and, of course, to eat American junkfood. All with plenty of drugs on the side.

America was coming to Asia!!

CLEANING AWAY THE COBWEBS

And the previous, popular Afghan government? Where were those boys, anyway?

“Human rights groups are urging that mass gravesites in northern Afghanistan be immediately secured and investigated for evidence of possible war crimes involving United States military personnel. An Irish documentary maker has secretly filmed mass graves near the northern city of Mazar-e-sharif and interviewed witnesses who claim that container loads of prisoners were dumped in the desert. It’s alleged that most suffocated in the sealed containers, but those left alive were shot on the spot. Key aspects of his claims are backed up by a detailed report from the group Physicians for Human Rights.” (Tony Jones and Jonathan Harley, Mass grave discovered in Afghanistan, Australian Broadcasting Corporation LATELINE, 19 Jun 2002)

Word got around as to what was going on, and Afghan prisoners didn’t like what they heard one bit. And so the Americans turned to their air power, dropping bombs on unarmed prisoners:

“An uprising by defiant Taliban and Al Qaeda prisoners was crushed under British and American guidance. With the might of air strikes as many as 400 prisoners were killed in what’s been widely described as a massacre.” (id.)

Wow! Dropping bombs on unarmed prisoners. What a model of warfare.

But at least it was a quick way to go.

“But new material alleges that this horrific chapter was only part of a much larger and deadly story around Mazar-e-sharif, in which prisoners of war were murdered and buried en masse.

JOHN HEFFERNAN, PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: We then went out to the site and really did kind of a preliminary assessment and we were able to determine, yes, in fact there was a large area that had been recently bulldozed because the tracks were still there.

There were quite a bit of skeletal remains as well as clothing.

So we speculated that perhaps the people in this site, the bodies in this site, were the people who were unaccounted for in what is referred to as the surrender of Kunduz.

JONATHAN HARLEY: Surrounded and faced with only a fight to the death, at least 6,000 Taliban and Al Qaeda fighters surrendered in the town of Kunduz in November.

Several were taken to the fort near Mazar-e-sharif, scene of the deadly uprising.

Around 3,000 were taken further west, to be held at a fort in Sheberghan.

But at least 2,000 prisoners who were supposed to be protected under the Geneva conventions appear to be unaccounted for.

EYEWITNESS: Many of the prisoners lost their lives on the journey and at Sheberghan they offloaded the prisoners who were still alive.

But some of the Taliban were injured and others were so weak they were unconscious.

We brought them to this place.

They took the injured who were still alive and shot them over there and also over there.

JONATHAN HARLEY: The Boston-based Physicians for Human Rights believe those men may be in mass graves about 10 kilometres outside of Sheberghan.

Citing eyewitnesses and having exhumed 15 bodies the human rights watchdog is urging an international inquiry and fencing off the area immediately.

JONATHON HEFFERNAN: With we need to protect that site and carry out a more no row investigation so the entire site can be examined.

What I said is that the numbers of people that are unaccounted for from the surrender of Kunduz, between 1,000, 2,000, 3,000, the numbers vary, but clearly quite a few people.

JONATHAN HARLEY: How they die asked the subject of a yet to be released documentary by Irish film-maker Jamie Doran.

His crew went secretly into the desert outside of Sheberghan where they were shown what appears to be a mass grave site.

Clothing and bodies are seen in shallow graves.

The site was identified by two local truck drivers.

The documentary alleges as many as 3,000 Taliban and Al Qaeda prisoners were buried outside Sheberghan under the gaze of American troops.

JOURNALIST: When you brought them here were any American soldiers around?

EYEWITNESS: Yes, there were.

JOURNALIST: Here?

EYEWITNESS: Yes. Here. Maybe 30 to 40.

JONATHAN HARLEY: Citing testimony by commercial drivers and Northern Alliance soldiers including at least one senior officer, the documentary alleges a range of atrocities.

Among them that Taliban and Al Qaeda prisoners were crammed into cargo containers for their journey from Kunduz, that with up to 300 men per container, many suffocated, and that others were shot dead while in the containers, albeit as a gruesome attempt to give them some air.

NORTHERN ALLIANCE SOLDIER: My commanders ordered me to shoot the containers to make holes for ventilation.

Because of that some of the prisoners were killed.

JONATHAN HARLEY: And those prisoners who made it to Sheberghan fort may have been little better off.

The documentary alleges atrocities by American personnel as they interrogated prisoners.

EYEWITNESS: They cut their legs, I was a witness.

They cut their tongues and cut their hair and beards.

I was watching.” (id.)

SO MUCH FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH

The patriotic people of Afghanistan wanted to shut down the drug business in their country.

And their reward? Mass murder and horrible torture.

At left we see an Afghan soldier being brutally beaten by the servants of “Uncle Sam”.

Maybe this is a new development, though. A special response to a horrible terrorist threat!

Or maybe, actually certainly, not.

You can see this sort of thing anyplace where the drugs, booze, or “national security” scams are running.

There are those genius types running the racket. They get lots of money, big houses, and “power”. And who guards the racket?

Oh, its the enforcers. You can see how this works in the outstanding film American Gangster, or just walk down to the “nightlife”. Clustered around the door, you’ll see some big boys with big muscles (but not big brains). At the finer “clubs”, they wear black suits, as if they were in high society.

Their job is easy to understand. Bossman gets to sell his alcohol (and whatever else) at a high price, and anybody who disturbs the operation will fly on out the door.

But that’s at the alcohol shop.

In the heroin business, the stakes are a little higher, so the enforcers get a little meaner (as shown above).

PROFILE OF AN ENFORCER

Let’s say you have a country like Afghanistan — a country which has supplied world heroin markets for years — and then some civic-minded citizens hurt your supply. They’ve been elected to run the country and clean things up. There are lots of them, and they know how to work their guns.

Who will you send in to enforce your turf claims?

How about a bunch of trees!!

But look more closely. Some of those trees are actually grown men who painted their faces with camouflage.

No. Are we really talking special forces here?

SPECIAL FORCES IN A SPECIAL WAR

“U.S. Special Forces have begun the ground phase of America’s war against terrorism in Afghanistan, operating in small numbers in southern Afghanistan in support of the CIA’s effort in the Taliban heartland, defense officials said yesterday.” (Thomas E. Ricks and Vernon Loeb, Special Forces Open Ground Campaign, Washington Post, 19 Oct 2001)

And the slaughter of unarmed prisoners in northern Afghanistan? “U.S. military officials have said since the war began Oct. 7 that Army Special Forces have been operating in northern Afghanistan to coordinate with the Northern Alliance, a coalition comprised primarily of ethnic Uzbeks and Tajiks.” (id.)

“Unlike conventional soldiers, who are instructed to bring massive firepower onto the enemy (often indiscriminately), commandos kill few people.

A successful mission is usually one where they slip in, run their operations, then slip out undetected. Unnecessary killing risks compromise. If American generals found little use for special operations forces, politicians have. Covert action is an age-old instrument of state. The atomic era rendered the superpowers conventional armies good for not much more than deterrence. Secret unconventional armies, with their cover of deniability, became weapons of choice for the Cold War competition in the Third World. Despite any noble ideals they might profess, American presidents have always found it useful to have a force handy to fight dirty little wars that violate normal rules of conduct.” (Douglas C. Waller, The Commandos: the Inside Story of America’s Secret Soldiers, Simon & Schuster, 1994, p 31)

And so we saw a “dirty little war” in Afghanistan. Where the “normal rules of conduct” were violated.

“An uprising by defiant Taliban and Al Qaeda prisoners was crushed under British and American guidance. With the might of air strikes as many as 400 prisoners were killed in what’s been widely described as a massacre.” (Jones, supra)

These thousands of prisoners who were slaughtered “under the gaze of American troops” were people who absolutely had to go. And why?

They were bad for business.

You mean, the oil business? No, of course not, that was the Iraq job. In Afghanistan, its the opium/heroin trade.

And so the civic-minded Afghans were scheduled for elimination, while “The US is conducting a review of its Afghanistan policy against a background of growing disillusionment with the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, whose government is riddled with corruption and who has failed to extend government control much beyond Kabul.” (Ewen MacAskill, Miliband to discuss Afghanistan with Hillary Clinton in Washington today, Guardian, 3 Feb 2009)

STORM CLOUDS

While the enforcers did a tolerable job, slaughtering thousands of prisoners, and torturing thousands more both in the Bagram and Kandahar torture centers, as well on Cuba, they didn’t get the leadership, and they didn’t even get all the Taliban soldiers.

The American style is to fight big wars, then grab the enemy leaders and put them on trial as common criminals. Like they did in Norway, Germany, Panama, Japan, and Iraq. Torture and murder lots of prisoners, as in Norway, Germany, Japan, Iraq, and the Philippines, and then move on to the next war — handing out liberal doses of freedom and democracy along the way.

A lot of Afghans didn’t like the narco state business, even if it was sugarcoated in talk of freedom and democracy, so these people have formed their own special forces units!!!

CLASH OF THE TITANS

An A-Team consists of 12 Special Forces Soldiers; two officers, and ten sergeants. All team members are SF qualified and cross-trained in different skills. They are also multi-lingual.

The A-Team is almost unlimited in it’s capabilities to operate in hostile or denied areas. A-Teams can infiltrate and exfiltrate their area of operations by air, land, or sea.

An A-Team can operate for an indefinite period of time in remote locations with little or no outside support. They are truly independent, self-sustaining “detachments”.

The Taliban special forces soldiers were having a get-together:

“The latest fighting broke out Monday soon after Taliban fighters — including Taliban from Pakistan and Iran — massed in Farah province in western Afghanistan, said Belqis Roshan, a member of Farah’s provincial council. The provincial police chief, Abdul Ghafar, said 25 militants and three police officers died in that battle near the village of Ganjabad in Bala Baluk district, a Taliban-controlled area near the border with Iran.” (Afghan President Orders U.S. Bombing Probe, Fox, 6 May 2009)

The American Marine special forces showed up, and the boys traded fire.

By now, the people of Afghanistan know that when U.S. special forces show up, mayhem follows, and this situation was no exception!

“Villagers told Afghan officials that they put children, women, and elderly men in several housing compounds in the village of Gerani — about three miles to the east — to keep them safe. But villagers said fighter aircraft later targeted those compounds, killing a majority of those inside, according to Roshan and other officials.” (id.)

The Afghans evacuated vulnerable people from the scene, and put them in a place they thought would be safe some 3 miles away from the fighting. But then the American planes came, and targeted the houses where the children, women, and the elderly were staying.

The scene of the crime was miles away from the actual fighting, so we know this had nothing to do with an immediate threat to the safety of the U.S. special forces.

So what was the military rationale? Or was this just cold-blooded murder?

We know what an A-Team is — those are people who sneak around and kill. A B-Team supports the A-Team. But what in the world is a C-Team?

Oh, that the children’s team. Who knows what those little kids will turn into when they grow up? Some of the children’s fathers were in the Taliban special forces, so these little ones could easily follow their fathers’ examples and fight against the opium trade.

PREVENTIVE WARFARE

And so the American Special Forces are taking no chances.

“A Western official in Kabul said Marine special operations forces — which fall under the U.S. coalition — had called in the airstrikes. The official asked not to be identified because he wasn’t authorized to release the information.

Khan said villagers brought bodies, including women and children, to Farah city to show the province’s governor. Khan estimated that villagers brought about 30 bodies.

Farah’s hospital treated at least three wounded villagers, including an 11-year-old boy whose chest, arms and shoulders were completely bandaged. A girl named Shafiqa had bandages under her chin. Two of her toes were severed in the fighting.

“We were at home when the bombing started,” she told AP Television News. “Seven members of my family were killed.”

Khan said villagers told him more than 150 civilians had died, but he said he had no way to know whether that claim was true.

Journalists and human rights workers can rarely visit remote battle sites to verify claims of civilian casualties. U.S. officials say Taliban militants sometimes force villagers to lie and say civilians have died in coalition strikes.

But the villagers’ claims Tuesday were bolstered by the wounded at Farah’s hospital shown on AP Television News. And Khan’s account of several truckloads of bodies taken to Farah city added more weight to the claims.” (id.)

The little girl Shafiqa lost some toes, but is lucky to be alive. She knows the injuries and death were caused by the American planes. But the American military says this little girl is lying! “U.S. officials say Taliban militants sometimes force villagers to lie and say civilians have died in coalition strikes.” (id.)

What effrontery.

THEY ALWAYS LIE

But is this the first time the American military has tried to lie away the evidence of their atrocities? “An Afghan government commission previously found that an August 2008 operation by U.S. forces killed 90 civilians in Azizabad, a finding backed by the U.N. The U.S. originally said no civilians died; a high-level investigation later concluded 33 civilians were killed.” (id.) The puppet government and the U.N. count the bodies, and find 90 have been murdered. The American military denies it. And then admits it was lying.

Its a sad matter. If they’re not slaughtering children and women one day, they may be cutting the tongues of prisoners the next. Or, say, destroying a couple of houses for sport.

Jesus knew about people like this:

CONDEMNING THE ENFORCERS

“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” John 8:44

JEWISH NEWS MEDIA PROFESSIONAL

Mr. Perez Hilton is one of the “professional homosexuals. They are gay people for a living.” (Bruce Vilanch cited in Japhy Grant, Perez Hilton’s gay witch hunt, Salon, 15 Dec 2006) Mr. Hilton, also known as Mario Armando Lavandeira, is active in the world of pornography. “After two years of Hilton appropriating — OK, stealing — online paparazzi photos, scrawling words like “whoreanus” (a, um, “pun” on the word heinous) across them using Microsoft Paint and posting them on his site”. (id.)

As we learned here, the porn business is the exclusive domain of Jews — Jews like Mr. Hilton. (http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_perez_hilton_jewish)

JEWISH PHILOSOPHERS SPEAK OUT

According to Jewish philosopher Lazarus Bendavid, “The Jews had all the slavish shortcomings: they envied and hated their Christian oppressors; they practiced the most miserable ceremonies“. (Raphael Patai, The Jewish mind, Wayne State University Press, 1996, p 466)

Those little shortcomings like not respecting the privacy, and private property, of his fellow Jews in the Hollywood community. All of this has lead his fellow Jews at the Tabloid Digest to depict Mr. Hilton as a devil. http://www.tabloiddigest.com/category/perez-hilton-sucks/

We learned here about the recent sighting of a devil in Malmö, confirmed by highly reliable police witnesses. The devil has also been spotted in France and Oslo, among other places.

THE BEAST, OR JUST HIS REP?

But could Mr. Hilton really be a devil, or at least a Satan worshiper?

Mr. Hilton’s first blog was called “PageSixSixSix”. (Grant, supra)

And what does this number mean?

We turn to Revelation 13, in the Holy Bible, and note that verse 18 gives it away:

“Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.” Revelation 13:18

PROPHECY GETS FULFILLED!!

Maybe the Revelation of Jesus Christ gives away some more clues as to what’s going on?

“16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: 17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”

While the Revelation is written in mysterious language, as most prophecies are, we see that unless people get a “mark” in their forehead, or hand, their commercial activities will be limited.

Say, the mark of thinking about life the way the beast wants them to.

At left we see the 666 beast in a meditative pose, beside a reasonably young woman who appears to have fallen for the message of the beast.

WHEN A GOY FALLS

She’s painted. The hair appears to be dyed. Which brings us back to the April Fool’s special. As Dr. Jean Munro, medical director of the Breakspear Hospital in Hertfordshire, says, “There is no question that people are being damaged by their cosmetics. So many things are put into cosmetics now that are carcinogenic, and it is allowed because cosmetics are not considered to be as serious as drugs or food. One of the most extreme cases I have seen was a woman whose bone marrow was affected by chemicals used in hair dye. The situation as it is is plainly dangerous – unacceptably so.”

Dangerous products receive heavy promotion, and the sheep go for it. Ready, Set, Shop. And now it was time to get a new promotional vehicle for the cosmetics industry, Anno 2009.

HELP US SELL

Of course, cosmetics is not the only product line being pushed by the Jews this season, so it was important to see how the prospective Miss USA (Miss Promotional Agent) would speak to gay marriage.

“When asked by judge Perez Hilton, an openly gay gossip blogger, whether she believed in gay marriage, Miss California, Carrie Prejean, said “We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite. And you know what, I think in my country, in my family, I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody out there, but that’s how I was raised.”" (Miss California Sparks Furor With Gay Marriage Comments on Miss USA Telecast, Fox, 20 Apr 2009) Ms. Prejean has a beautiful body. Nice white teeth in that smile. And she obviously has fallen for the cosmetics trap. Surely this would be the right girl to make marketing appearances for the cosmetics/hair dye business?

JUST ONE “MARK” MISSING

Almost. She just needed to have that special mark in her forehead. Which she didn’t have.

So she didn’t get the chance to “buy and sell”. You can only enjoy her good looks. And hope she enjoyed spreading around the good cheer — because her career prospects in the porn/cosmetics business are over.

The competition was pretty simple: “Contestants were judged by their performance in swimsuit and evening gown modeling contests and their responses to a question asked onstage” (id.) With a body like hers, Ms. Prejean obviously had no problem “performing” in a swimsuit. The only problem was with her answer:

JUST AS WITH RAYMOND ROGER TRENCAVEL

“Trump said that Prejean’s question was “a bit unlucky,” arguing that no matter how she answered the question “she was going to get killed.”

Was Carrie damned if she did and damned if she didn’t” (The Dish Rag by Elizabeth Snead, Donald Trump on Carrie Prejean’s gay view: Either way, ’she was going to get killed.’, http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/thedishrag/2009/04/donald-trump-on-carrie-prejeans-gay-stand-either-way-she-was-going-to-get-killed.html)

MEDIA CELEBRITY AND BUSINESS AUTHORITY SPEAKS TRUTH

And business genius Donald Trump was right on target! She answers the question like she did, and that “buy and sell” career is closed off. She answers the question the Jewish way, and she gets “killed” (as per Trump, supra) by that fast Hollywood lifestyle, which so often includes a drug-related death. If the cosmetics-related cancer doesn’t get her first.

A business based on the deception: You buy our products and you’ll look like our models. Which ties in with the work of the 666 beast, which “deceiveth them that dwell on the earth”. Revelation 13:14

But say that some dweller of the earth hasn’t been totally deceived?

“no matter how she answered the question “she was going to get killed.” (Trump, supra)

“And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.” Revelation 13:15

UPDATES EVERY 10-15 DAYS

Sometimes a woman turns her back on thoughts of marriage and family, and dedicates her life to serving the pope. There are happy moments (see at right), but also long hours of prayer.

Picture a group of nuns standing in formation in the stone chapel of a French convent. Say, in the autumn of 1654. You can hear singing, prayer chants. Its an atmosphere of devotion and praise.

But then an intruder bursts into the room. What kind?

See what the nuns have to say.

Keep in mind that these women spend lots and lots of time in studying spiritual mysteries, so they must know the devil when they see him.

1654 DEVIL SIGHTING

“The Devil … half-naked!“. And so it is. This black devil is wearing a trouser, but is half naked.

What to do? “Vade retro, Satanas!” Step back, Satan!!

These experienced nuns have absolutely no doubt who their visitor is: “Upon my soul, it’s Beelzebub!“

Lots of skeptics, and even sincere Christians, have wondered: Where does the Devil maintain his base of operations on this earth. One of the older nuns helpfully explains: “It’s an African native.”

What? “A native?”

And then this false shepherd proceeded to mislead the nuns, explaining: “A human being with a soul, like you or me.”

This was quite a surprising concept. “A black soul?“

“Naturally. But baptism and prayer can wash it clean.”

GETTING THE PICTURE IN MIND

Need help in putting the picture together? Then get the outstanding film La Fille de d’Artagnan. If you get the French version with English subtitles, you’ll see the above dialog.

And, of course, you’ll see the exceedingly talented French actress Sophie Marceau in action. From sword-fighting to a well-formed chest, this woman has it all.

And displays it in the film.

AGE-OLD QUESTION

This very entertaining film is not just about cheap entertainment. Not even just about Sophie Marceau’s wonderful body.

No, its a deep philosophical piece. Throughout the ages people have spotted the devil. Most of the French nuns had NO PROBLEM identifying him straight away. But then there are always those people who say, No, wait a minute. That’s just an African native. Sure his soul is black, but it can be washed clean with baptism and prayer.

People like the religious leadership in Oslo.

Norway is quite a religious country, with more than 20 Bible schools serving a population of just about 5 million.

These are places where youth get prepared for mission work. To places like Africa.

Youth like the woman pictured at left. A 23-year-old Norwegian woman was living in the dormitory at Fjellhaug. The same dormitory where an Ethiopian Bible scholar was living. “A black soul?“

“Naturally. But baptism and prayer can wash it clean.”

So, his black soul was washed clean? According to the Norwegian Lutheran Mission Society (Norsk Luthersk Misjonssamband), which operates Fjellhaug Bible School, this was entirely possible.

HOW CLEAN DID IT GET AFTER ALL THAT WASHING?

And apparently the Norwegian woman at the Fjellhaug dormitory believed this line. Up until the day when the devil burst into her dorm room. And now it was time for “Vade retro, Satanas” and “Upon my soul, it’s Beelzebub!“

He needed sex. And he needed it now.

The Norwegian woman said no. So the devil got out his knife and set to work. Leaving the woman with nasty cuts on her hands and face.

The devil has been described as black, 175cm tall, with a missing front tooth. He also has a little bit of belly. The police have quite looking for him, “since they know who he is and where he lives.” (Håkon Løtveit, Knivskadd kvinne etter voldtektsforsøk på studenthjem, NRK, 11 Apr 2009)

FALSE SHEPHERDS LEAD THE FLOCK ASTRAY

The Night of Fire was a mass slaughter of French people on Haiti. It happened because they had devils living at close quarters. The French trusted the devils, and paid the price.

So, who softened them up, and weakened their natural defenses? Oh, just the priests:

“The priests asserted that the mulattoes could simply not understand the Holy Trinity and the mystery of the Son of God. For the slaves, on the other hand, it was considered easier for them to fathom the mysteries of the Catholic religion because of their African background and familiarity with voodoo. So the priests gave regular attention to the slaves, while leaving the mulattoes to live their lives as they saw fit. By the beginning of the 18th century, Catholicism was being practiced so intensely by the slaves, who were so often desperate for solace, that it was becoming a mania.” (Martin Ros, Translated by Karin Ford-Treep, Night of Fire – The Black Napoleon and the Battle for Haiti, SARPEDON, 1991, p 22)

The natural reaction among the French would have been, “Vade retro, Satanas!” But the priests assured them these black souls could be washed clean. The French on Haiti who believed these liars paid the price when the devils “decapitated children and stuck the quivering limbs and heads onto their spears and swords like trophies. Young girls were raped repeatedly and murdered in front of their mothers eyes—and then the mothers suffered the same fate.” (Ros, p 6)

Knife play and plenty of rape. All in a day’s work for the devil.

THE QUESTION IS SETTLED

So now we know who was right in that debate back in the autumn of 1654.

HUGE DAMAGE FROM EARTHQUAKE

L’Aquila is a town in central Italy. At 0330 on Monday, 6 April 2009, the earth shook. At this time of day, most people were inside, in the midst of pleasant dreams. Lots of houses were damaged, and some fell right down — on the unlucky people inside. “The dead have exceeded 200 and the injured 1,500, while the list of the victims is continually becoming bigger. The damages in the medieval city and in the surrounding areas are extensive, while thousands of people are now homeless. As per the Italian authorities, Onna, the village near L’Aquila has been literally leveled from the quake, the magnitude of which continues to bifurcate scientists.” (L’Aquila, the Ghost City, ERTonline News, 7 Apr 2009)

Its not as if the earth shook just once, and all the damage was done and over. No, “The aftershocks continue to shake L’Aquila, causing more damages. The strongest aftershock, 4.7 magnitude, was registered at 12:30 Greek time.” (id.)

SOME ITALIANS GOT LUCKY

Many structures were destroyed, and many Italians were killed outright or trapped in the rubble of collapsed buildings. “A 24-year-old student, Marta Valente, was recovered after being trapped under the rubble for 23 hours. Later, Valeria Espozito was lucky to be discovered and rescued by the rescue teams.” (id.) So, many buildings were destroyed. The lucky people escaped right off, or were rescued from the rubble later.

But, as noted, plenty of Italians were not so lucky on the day the earthquake hit. “Mr Berlusconi spoke of a huge catastrophe”. (id.)

POLICE CHASE THIEVES

The earthquake brought out the thieves: “Police officers were patrolling the city all night to avert looting, while according to police reports several arrests took place.” (id.)

While the earthquakes have badly damaged L’Aquila, professional rescuers are doing all they can to help the people. But what do you do when an entire country has been hit by a mega-quake, and those aftershocks just won’t stop?

Through the night from Saturday to Sunday, 5 April 2009, the police in Oslo were conducting intensive patrols. Just as in L’Aquila, their patrols were looking for thieves.

They found some too.

At left, we see the Oslo police restraining one of the thieves. The thief’s face is black.

He and his friends were out Saturday night with knives and at least one pistol. This African gang was cruising the streets, and robbing pedestrians. The youngest victim was 15.

Just as in L’Aquila, some injuries resulted. The Negro gang beat and kicked at least one unwilling victim so bad that he had to be hospitalized with head injuries. When these young Negroes showed up, they wanted to take monies and hurt the Norwegians.

When the earthquake struck in L’Aquila, property was also damaged.

The Negroes wanted cash cards (with PIN codes) and mobile telephones.

The action went down in the Grünerløkka area. (Grethe Kielland Jenssen, Kjetil Grude Flekkøy, Væpnet gjeng ranet folk på gata, NRK, 5 Apr 2009) An area that used to be Norwegian, but is now anything but that. The old structures there, like a peaceful Nordic population, schools with Nordic children, and the religious and cultural life have been all been destroyed by the earthquake and its aftershocks. Nowadays, this is the vibrant, diverse part of town, with mosques, gay discos, and a well-tanned population.

So was this a one-time deal, or just part of a pattern of aftershocks? About a year ago, in Copenhagen, the same thing was going on. On the very early morning of January 5, 2008, three young blacks were out on patrol on Strøget, the main pedestrian street in Copenhagen. They spotted two Danish fellows. One had a nice cap.

The diversity wanted the cap, but the Danish man was not feeling generous. So they stabbed him to death. (To mænd anholdt i knivdrabssag, DR, Jan 6, 2008, http://www.dr.dk/Nyheder/Indland/2008/01/06/052024.htm)

Not to mention the 4 Negroes who grabbed two Swedish women at the start of 2005. Apparently the girls lacked desire, so the boyz kicked and slashed them until unconscious. And then it was easier. (Våldtäktsoffer utsatt för utpressning och hot av massmedia, info14.com, 12 Feb 2005)

“The aftershocks continue to shake L’Aquila”, just as they do Scandanavia. We know what the quake was in Italy, but what about Scandanavia?

There was an earthshaking event there. But it happened a long, long time ago. Maybe 1800?

Not quite. By the time the 1800s arrived in Denmark, there were already about 3000 Jews in the country. Most lived in Copenhagen. This small group dominated the world of money and finance, science, the press, and the publishing industry. They also held down top positions in politics. (Søren Mørch, Den sidste Danmarkshistorie, Gyldendal, 1996, p. 388)

So, what about 1400? No, it was after that. After the mid-1400s, Norway was united with Denmark. They had the same laws, and there were still no Jews living in Denmark or Norway. Jews were specifically excluded from Hanse cities. (Oskar Mendelsohn, Jødenes historie i Norge gjennom 300 år, Bind I, Universitetsforlaget, 1969, p. 11)

The exact year that the first Jew came to Denmark cannot be determined with precision, but when the Jews came in and got established, they opened the floodgates for their African brethren as soon as they could.

Søren Mørch says they sewed up the top positions of control in Denmark. As we learned here, the “Norwegian” royal house is in Jewish hands. Not forgetting the Jewish prime minister, Jens Stoltenberg.

With most earthquakes, you have the massive shaking, and then smaller aftershocks. This one is different. The tremors of the first Jew in Scandanavia were barely noticed, and now the aftershocks become more acute with each passing year.

The aftershocks tend to happen at night. The blacks suit up, and do their thing. Just like on Haiti in 1791. Back in the days when “the fifty thousand, who, after weeks of preparation in the deepest secret, had unleashed the Night of Fire that held the whites paralyzed in dazed horror.
In a matter of days, two thousand whites were killed, 180 sugar plantations and 900 coffee plantations were destroyed, and two million francs’ worth of damage inflicted.” (Martin Ros, Translated by Karin Ford-Treep, Night of Fire – The Black Napoleon and the Battle for Haiti, SARPEDON, 1991, p 6)

The French had more backbone than the Scandanavians. They struck back.

“Then the whites struck back in a way that was even more gruesome and indiscriminate. During their three-week-long counterterror, fifteen to twenty thousand blacks and mulattoes” (id.) were arrested, tried, and executed. “Once the whites had shaken off their fear of the Night of Fire, they were possessed by a tremendous rage.” (id.)

And so they settled down to finding out who was really behind the Night of Fire. Robust interrogations were used with effect: “The whites continued for days to seize every black they could lay their hands on, whether old, young, male or female, both those whom they suspected of having been supporters of the revolt and those whose innocence was beyond doubt.” (id.)

English police from Jamaica were called in to assist the investigation: “In Cap Francois, the Paris of the Pearl of the Antilles, the bloody hunt lasted for days. The slaves were hanged in the streets and, on the squares in front of the houses, they were tied to wheels on which their bodies were broken. The whites put on their Sunday best to celebrate their feast of revenge. British flags were flown because Governor Blanchelande had immediately called the British in Jamaica, who obliged with their own brand of assistance. The British were the best slave hunters in the world and they did not hesitate to bring their specially trained hounds to help crush the rebellion.” (Ros, supra, p 7)

Needless to say, this well-motivated team of highly-qualified investigators made quick progress: “The whites in power also murdered other whites because they found that, among the revolting slaves whom they had captured, there were Frenchmen who had blackened their faces and joined in the mayhem.” (id.)

Hmm. Frenchmen teamed with the slaves to murder fellow Frenchmen? Sounds so strange.

Unless they were a particular kind of Frenchmen: “Not much is known about Haiti’s Jewish history except that Luis de Torres, the interpreter for Christopher Columbus, in 1492 was the first Jew to set foot in Haiti. The first Jewish immigrants came from Brazil in the 17th century, after Haiti was conquered by the French. These marranos (Jews who feigned conversion to Christianity but secretly practiced Judaism) were all murdered or expelled — along with the rest of the white population — during the slave revolt of Toussaint L’Ouverture in 1804.” (Larry Luxner, Haiti’s few Jews hold on to history, Miami Herald, March 21, 2004)
Definition: “earthquake (a disturbance that is extremely disruptive)” http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=earthquake

Jews were in on the ground floor in Haiti. When France took over in the 1600s, lots more came. But they pretended to be Christians.

And there were all those wealthy competitors out there on their “180 sugar plantations and 900 coffee plantations“. Then, so conveniently, the night of fire came, and the competition was out of business. Real French would never have joined forces with the Blacks to slaughter their fellow Frenchmen and destroy the country by fire. As we learned in the matter of Béziers 1209: Crusade and Dominican Origins. Just as in Denmark, Norway, and Haiti, the Jews had gotten into Béziers. And the earthquake tremors culminated in an aftershock so powerful that the city was burned and the Frenchmen living there were massacred.

Norway has just experienced a “night of kicking, beating, and street robbery”.

Different name, but the players are the same.

More aftershocks will come. They will get more powerful with time. And then comes the Night of Fire.

NEXT RELEASE: APPROX. 25 APRIL

Its that special day in the year. Comes at the start of April, when the northern hemisphere weather is starting to warm up, the blossoms are out, and feelings of hope are high. Its April Fool’s Day.

“For the eager prankster, nothing beats April Fools’ Day, a light-hearted tradition that’s several hundred years old.

“A lot of people think [April Fools' Day] is just obnoxious, and just wish it would stop,” said Alex Boese, curator of the Museum of Hoaxes in San Diego, California.

“But people who love pranks really love the day and refuse to give up the tradition. They’re the ones who keep it alive.”" (Graeme Stemp-Morlock, April Fools’ Day Facts: Behind the Laughs, National Geographic News, March 28, 2008)

Some people get tired of all those pranks, and really wish they would stop. But there are those hardcore types out there who just totally love pranks (“A mischievous trick or practical joke.” http://www.answers.com/prank)!
Mischief: “Damage, destruction, or injury caused by a specific person or thing”. http://www.answers.com/mischief

We’ve carefully studied the Jewish tobacco business, which causes mass destruction. That’s “a specific person or thing” that inflicts one nasty prank on mankind — year after year.

While some people might find the smoker’s lungs depicted at left totally attractive and interesting, this sort of advertising wouldn’t work for the masses. If the tobacco industry got too honest, sales would drop off a cliff. And why let sales go off the cliff, if the sheep can go?

After all, its a matter of dollars and sense.

But just face it, the world is a big place, and there are a lot of fools out there. Say that only about 25% of people in the world fall for the tobacco prank. What about the rest of them?

“Boese notes, however, that the number of pranks in the home and at the office has decreased in recent years in the United States, and has been replaced by large institutionalized media hoaxes, he said.” (Stemp-Morlock, supra)

Wow! Ordinary people are getting tired of “pranks” at home. Why should they even bother, when there are those “large institutionalized media hoaxes“? We learned here that “The film is the advertising vehicle. And smoking is the message.“

“Sarah Jessica Parker was born on March 25, 1965 in Nelsonville, Ohio, to Stephen Parker, a Jewish American businessman, and Barbara, her mother.” (Sarah Jessica Parker, BuddyTV) Advertising vehicles in which she has appeared include “the HBO series Sex and the City, where she played Carrie, a writer of a sex-themed column in a newspaper. She started producing the show on its third season and, after five losses, won an Emmy award for her lead role. In 2008, the movie adaptation of Sex and the City was a worldwide hit.” (id.)

Ms. Parker is so beautiful, and oh so blond. In the films. At right we see a picture without the hair dye. Its just black hair, which is customary for Jews.

But looking at Ms. Parker in her films, you would never know.

The medium is the film, and the message is: You too can be beautiful if you buy our paints.

“Our” paints? We consider the magazine Teen Vogue, brought to teen women by the Jew Jonathan Newhouse, chairman of Conde Nast International. (www.teenvogue.com/corporate)

The magazine appears thanks to the “company’s 71-year-old Jewish owner, Si Newhouse,” and “his cousin Jonathan Newhouse, 46, who heads the company’s international operations.” (Michael Leapman, The NS Profile – Conde Nast, New Statesman, June 14, 1999, www.newstatesman.com/199906140013)

“Our power comes from having this group of magazines at one end of the market that give us 73 per cent of upmarket magazine advertising – that’s the blue-chip advertisers such as Estee Lauder, Ralph Lauren, Calvin Klein, Gucci, L’Oreal”. (id.) Jewish companies naturally bring their advertising to Jewish magazines.

There are no secrets here. These people say they have power. And so they show beautiful girls on the cover. And for all those not-so-beautiful readers? Well, “Ready, Set, Shop”!

Special paints are available in so many colors. If you paint up, and get the right hair color, you too can run pranks on society.

But at the same time as you run these pranks, the cosmetics business is probably running a job on you:

Often these brightly-colored packages contain cancer-causing chemicals like butylated hydroxyanisole, titanium dioxide, and dozens of other cancer-causing agents according to Dr. Sam Epstein, a cancer scientist at the University of Illinois in Chicago. (Erica Johnson, Cosmetics and the cancer connection, CBCnews, January 28, 2003, http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/files/health/cosmetics/)

“Mainstream cosmetics produced by mainstream industries are literally a witch’s brew of carcinogenic ingredients,” Epstein told Marketplace.

“Those are ugly words to the beauty business. Epstein’s 40 years of research have convinced him loads of personal care products may be giving us cancer.

Epstein’s research found a common skin cream contains at least two ingredients linked to cancer. A mascara: three. A blush: four. A lipstick: five.” (Id.)

While the amount contained is small, when used regularly, the damage is cumulative. (Id.)

So CBCnews decided to ask the producers about this. Tried to interview a dozen cosmetics companies. But none of them would talk. (Id.)

The adverse effects of cosmetics build up over years of use. (Tim Utton, Daily Mail, April 8, 2002, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/health/thehealthnews.html?in_article_id=108549&in_page_id=1797)

The head of cosmetics at Health Canada, Hugh Davis, describes cosmetics as “high risk”. (Johnson, Id.)

And a California study shows that women who use permanent hair dye double their risk of bladder cancer. (Id.)

And can you rely on the label? Often the carcinogenic contents are not even listed (Id.)

As Dr. Jean Munro, medical director of the Breakspear Hospital in Hertfordshire, says, “There is no question that people are being damaged by their cosmetics. So many things are put into cosmetics now that are carcinogenic, and it is allowed because cosmetics are not considered to be as serious as drugs or food. One of the most extreme cases I have seen was a woman whose bone marrow was affected by chemicals used in hair dye. The situation as it is is plainly dangerous – unacceptably so.” (Tim Utton, Daily Mail, April 8, 2002, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/health/thehealthnews.html?in_article_id=108549&in_page_id=1797)

But just as with the blackened smokers’ lungs, the cosmetics advertising doesn’t show you the many cancer cases resulting from cosmetics use. No, its just happy smiling girls — girls who would look good without cosmetics.

But its all just a prank, right? There’s definitely mischief, because “Damage, destruction, or injury” ensues. We recall that a prank is “A mischievous trick”. Well, women are being tricked every day of the year!

“Ready, Set, Shop”! And we’ll make you beautiful. So beautiful that you’ll shrivel away with cancer.

Ah, you wish this sort of prank would just go away?

“But people who love pranks really love the day and refuse to give up the tradition. They’re the ones who keep it alive.”" (Graeme Stemp-Morlock, April Fools’ Day Facts: Behind the Laughs, National Geographic News, March 28, 2008) And make a ton of money out of doing that. You see, for these people every day in the year is April Fool’s Day.

And the sheep line up at the box office to get into those special films (the advertisements). They get the message, “Ready, Set, Shop”, and the deceived sheep act on it.

“The GOYIM are a flock of sheep, and we are their wolves. And you know what happens when the wolves get hold of the flock? …” Protocol 11

The man with the red hat has followers all over the world — in Italy, America, and even in Africa. He runs a huge operation whose power depends on having lots of members who give lots of money.

On 17 March 2009, the pope flew down to Cameroon, in Africa, to see some of his faithful supporters. On board his plane, he spoke with a number of journalists. The matter of AIDS came up, and Benedict described this as: “a tragedy that cannot be overcome by money alone, that cannot be overcome through the distribution of condoms, which even aggravates the problems”. (Riazat Butt, Pope claims condoms could make African Aids crisis worse, Guardian, 17 March 2009)

AIDS is a disease which afflicts about 33 million people, and results in the death of about 2 million each year. (Global HIV/AIDS estimates, end of 2007, http://www.avert.org/worldstats.htm) While 2 million is a lot, its still less than the number of lives claimed by the highly profitable Jewish tobacco business.

About 22 million AIDS cases are located in sub-Saharan Africa, (Global HIV/AIDS estimates, end of 2007, http://www.avert.org/worldstats.htm) the place the pope was going to visit.

“It is important to understand that AIDS is a virus that damages the immune system, and you cannot die from AIDS, People who die with AIDS are killed by the infections that are not stopped by the immune system. AIDS can even turn the common cold into a life and death situation.” (All About AIDS, Immune Syste, http://library.thinkquest.org/03oct/01335/en/txt/immunesystem.html)

This is an infection, that, when you get it, makes it difficult for you to stop further infections. Which reminds us immediately of the tobacco business. Once you get started, its very difficult to quit. To avoid lung cancer, the method is pretty simple — stay away from tobacco smoke, whether you hold the cigarette or someone else does.

Surprise! With AIDS, the same great principle applies: stay away from sex with infected people. This sounds so simple, but so effective. And the pope knew it. While he asks, at least in public, his priests and nuns to leave off sex, he likes it when Catholic church members have lots of sex, because that makes lots of babies. Off to the baptistry, and in a few years the offering base of the church expands.

Obviously, the children grow up better if they have parents around, so the pope says, avoid promiscuity. Stick with one partner, and build up the church.

At the same time as people follow the very practical business advice of the pope, they also follow standard precautions for avoiding infectious diseases.

But what would the pharmaceutical industry do? How could they sell their expensive AIDS drugs if no one got sick?

A lot of money is on the line in a situation with lots and lots of sick addicts. We’ve learned who’s behind other cancer businesses like bras, cigarettes, and cosmetics. Maybe the players are the same?

“Rebecca Hodes, of the Treatment Action Campaign in South Africa, said the Pope’s “opposition to condoms conveys that religious dogma is more important to him than the lives of Africans”. ” (Pope’s condom stance sparks row, BBC, 18 March 2009)

The pope has outlined a solution to the AIDS problem which applies the standard precautions so commonly employed in other disease situations. But Ms. Hodes (pictured second from right at the Cape Town launch of “The Jews in South Africa”, together with fellow Jews Michal and Tony Leon, and Jeremy Boraine) doesn’t like that approach. Sure it would be 100% effective, but for some reason she likes the condom approach.

So, how safe are condoms?

“The proper use of condoms during intercourse usually prevents infection.” (Chlamydia infections in women, MedlinePlus, http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000660.htm) (emphasis added)

Condoms “usually” work?

“Among people who use condoms consistently and correctly, pregnancy rates are fairly low—about 3 pregnancies per 100 women in the first year of use.” (How Effective Are Condoms?, Population Reports, The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, http://www.infoforhealth.org/pr/h9/h9chap4.shtml) And that’s for people who use them all the time, and correctly.

What about the rest of users? “The estimated typical pregnancy rate among condom users in the US is about 14 per 100 women.” (id.)

And that’s safe?

“Since the 1970s studies of typical use have demonstrated that condoms provide some protection against gonorrhea, syphilis, and chlamydia. For example, consistent condom use probably reduces the risk of chlamydia and gonorrhea infection by about 60% to 80%.” (id.)

The FDA requires that condoms be tested for water leakage. The standard is that less than 1 out of 400 tested can leak water. (Condoms, AVERT.org) And if you got a leaking condom? Tough luck.

These super-safe, sex protective devices burst only about 2 percent of the time. (id.) As one authoritative reference puts it: “Male condoms and female condoms provide some protection.” (Medical Encyclopedia Info on Chlamydia, http://www.medicineonline.com/reference/Society/Advice/Personal_Pages/info/Chlamydia.htm)(emphasis added)

Consequently, if you take Ms. Hodes advice, you get protection that “usually” works. If the condom doesn’t burst, or leak.

Even the American CDC agrees with the pope:

“The most reliable ways to avoid transmission of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), are to abstain from sexual activity or to be in a long-term mutually monogamous relationship with an uninfected partner.” (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Condoms and STDs: Fact Sheet for Public Health Personnel)

So why would Ms. Hodes be pushing condoms when they regularly fail?

Probably for the same reason her fellow Jews push tobacco, Madoff-style investment schemes, and bras.

The progress of the disease starts when you let the infection in once. After that, infections will come again and again, as the body is less and less able to defend itself.

Sometimes people like the pope speak a word of sense and warning, but those microbes keep trying to get in. And this will continue until standard medical precautions are implemented to stop the spread of these dangerous diseases.

We defer to one of the leading experts in the field of medical science, Prince Meshchersky. In the time of Tsar Alexander III, when between April 1881 and June 1883, “a million Jews had fled the country taking with them some twenty-two million pounds”, the prince stated:

“When the microbes have to be destroyed, we do not pause to inquire how many microbes like the process.” (A.N. Wilson, Tolstoy, W.W. Norton & Company, 1988, pp 359, 360)